Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.
Leaders have always been under interesting analysis, as they represent a mechanism of social organization that recurs in several animal species, human kind included. Why we feel so comfortable in being guided by a leader is to be discussed and, in particular, it is to be deepened the way group demands and leaders’ creation are linked one to each other. In my opinion, it is never a one-sided circumstance: with nuances that depend on different situations, it is usually true that demands do create leaders, and leaders do create demands.
As often happens, referring to our history can give us substantial and pivotal instances to answer to our dilemmas. Politics are, as a matter of fact, an evident field of prolific leading activities. We can, for example, consider Hitler. In the early 20th century Germany, not so differently from the rest of Europe, people were going through what we now call a European fever (the social mechanisms that led to World War II). More particularly, German citizens were demurring about a number of social questions and evident demands of the nation, specifically related to the Jews community and to several economical and geo-political issues. This is not the place to discuss how germane and shrewd these questions were: it is a fact that they resulted in the election of Hitler as president of Germany. Hence, a sequence of national moral and ethical transformation: Hitler gradually waxed the hate and fear against strangers, and enticed his people to follow him in his world-wide well known policies and, then, to his wars. Isn't this a undoubtable evidence of how demands and leaders are strictly correlated, has demands created Hitler and Hitler crated new demands?
Nonetheless, we can underline similar sets of consequentiality in the scientific research world. Academies, colleges, universities: all share the teachers-students structure that consists in lessons and research activities guided by the highest pundits and operated by students and lower researchers. In other words, it is again happening the same cycle: there is a common necessity, a global demand for researches and scientific development, so that professors and scientists are chosen, selected or sometimes even elected to conduct universities and instruct other doctors. At the same time, though, it is incontrovertible that the professors themselves push science toward the direction they are more likely to believe in, maybe because of their penchants, or just because it seems witty to them.
Having analysed these two variegated examples, by which we can almost surely conclude that leaders and demands both play crucial roles of the same game, I would now make use of the philosophy of an ancient thinker, Socrates. In the Greece of the bases of our democracy, Socrates stated that "the human being is a <zoòn politikòn>", that is, a political or social animal. In his aims, he wanted to highlight how we, men, are natural team workers and that, on the other hand, we need team work, social responds, public contact, or, more lucidly, we need friends. And it is properly among friends that we prove how correct the thesis of this essay is: we need to be organized in even small communities, and we also feel the necessity of being guided by someone that, always, stands out as the leader of the group. The demands for a sort of "group management", thus, is what creates a leader among friends... and then, the same leader will help the group itself to have an ever-increasing number of demands to solve as to achieve the perfect community, aligning to the idea of Socrates of human as a social animal.
To conclude, by means of reasoning about politics, science and social systems, it seems wise to infer that leaders are a natural derivative of our approach to community life and activities. By this point of view, leaders are the obvious evolution of our needs to respond to certain demands and, at the same time, they are the individuals who furnish us with even further demands and paths through which we can be guided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-11 | rahatumar9072 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. 79
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. 79
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1025, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Isn't
... known policies and, then, to his wars. Isnt this a undoubtable evidence of how dema...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1035, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...icies and, then, to his wars. Isnt this a undoubtable evidence of how demands and...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in particular, sort of, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3412.0 2235.4752809 153% => OK
No of words: 672.0 442.535393258 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07738095238 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09145979004 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94853670374 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 361.0 215.323595506 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537202380952 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 1064.7 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5669718673 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.347826087 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2173913043 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.39130434783 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271253989679 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693717126834 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849141472942 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14290931572 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612291249037 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 100.480337079 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.