Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
Through learning, people of the past had established what we see today and similarly, the present generation is making or shaping the world for the future. However, learning is not something that should always attribute to educational institution like school or college. Thus I mostly agree with the prompt for three reasons.
First of all, learning precedes institutions like school or college, meaning there was always an inclination for learning among the people even when there was no established institution to provide education. For example, at the beginning of the human lives, people learned how to survive, they gathered knowledge about self-protection and made the way of living in this world, all of which denotes learning. However, at that time, there were no such institutions that could provide them with certain types of abilities or knowledge in order for their survival. It was individual’s own choice which provoked them to learn for their own benefit. And who wishes not to learn, eventually lost in time. Therefore, no educational institutions were needed to motivate them to learn. Hence, it proves that schools or colleges cannot motivate to learn, rather the necessity of learning made those institutions.
Secondly, over the course of time, people have developed themselves to the stage when they thought that a definitive structure is also needed to enhance the process of learning, and only because of this reason educational institutions were created. So, they were made not to motivate someone to learn but to ensure proper and more sophisticated knowledge for them who were already agreed to learn meaning that the function of educational institutions is not to encourage someone to learn but to show the way of learning and provide essential equipment for learning.
Finally, if the institutions could motivate students to learn, then there were no incidents of dropouts in the schools or colleges. But, in reality we have a myriad number of incidents of dropouts throughout the world in terms of dropout. It is evident that parents get their children admitted into educational institutions but when the students lost motivation for learning, they fail to accomplish their task and eventually drop out from the institutions. However, a student who has the thirst for learning, even if he fails in exams, try harder to complete his course. And it is his self-made motivation for acquiring knowledge that helps him to become industrious, not the institutions.
To sum up, even though sometimes the environment of the institutions encourage students to acquire knowledge, school or college alone is not enough to provide enough motivation for learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | KalyaniHarbola | 75 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | abhikhanna | 54 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | Evanica | 80 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | Ahmed.I | 79 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | yash47001 | 66 | view |
- Political leaders should withhold information from public 66
- A national curriculum for schools 79
- The charts bleow give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009 73
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized 83
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nal institution like school or college. Thus I mostly agree with the prompt for thre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to mean'.
Suggestion: to mean
...r them who were already agreed to learn meaning that the function of educational instit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28037383178 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92895988523 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483644859813 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2703413363 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.555555556 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184294785775 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690894750108 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041108482777 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113154023164 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263778259931 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.