Many students today have their own cell phones and take them everyplace they go. This becomes a problem when they bring them into classroom. Schools should completely ban the presence of cell phones in the classroom.
Cell phones have been popular in use throughout the world and have been used by people of all ages. Students all over the world are fantasized by cell phones in this tech-crazy world. The author here asserts that many students today have their own cell phones and take them everywhere they go. In fact, they take their cell phones to the classroom and it poses a serious problem. Therefore, the author recommends to ban the presence of cell phones in the classroom. However, in my view I agree partially agree with the author.
Cell phones today are a huge element of distraction to most of the students who use them. Students all over the world are engaging in various activities happening in their cell phone like gaming, chatting, and surfing over the internet to a greater extent. As a result, all these activities today are producing a negative effect in their studies as well in personal life. Consider a student busy gaming whole day on the cell phone. Such a student develops a sense of hatred and it also affects his mental behavior in the society. Or, consider the case of a student busy whole day chatting with peers on the cell phone. Such activities shift the focus of the students from their studies and have detrimental results in their academic life. The problem today of most of the students is that they lack the sense of their limits to which they should use their cell phones.
Even in classrooms, when a teacher is teaching an important topic, some students are busy in their own world of their cell phones. As a result, such nuisances disturb the whole classroom as teaching process is affected which produces a negative effect on other students as well. Also, the discipline of a classroom is put to danger when such students use cell phones inside the classroom. Therefore, most of the institutions and schools are putting a ban on the presence of mobile phones inside the classroom as it impedes the process of learning. In fact, many schools and universities impose heavy fines on the students who are caught with mobile phones inside their classroom or campus. Such a ban has produced some positive results as students are isolated from these sources of distraction and hence, can effectively concentrate on their studies.
However, such a ban is only beneficial when a student is within boundaries of school or university campus. When a student steps outside the classroom or the campus of a school or a university, cell phone can again keep them engaged in their own destructive activities. Hence, by merely putting such a ban in classroom or school campus cannot ensure that students reduce their use of cell phones. Also, another limitation of such a ban is that a cell phones have numerous advantages that outweigh its disadvantages. Cell phones can be used a fruitful source of learning as students can obtain information from a plethora of websites. Also, such cell phones can keep the students updated on the technological development going on in this digital era. Therefore, we can find that cell phones have numerous advantages and disadvantages as well.
In sum, I conclude by stating that banning the presence of cell phones in classroom is not a complete solution for the students to avoid the problem of using cell phones. Rather, the students should be taught how to make a proper and judicious use of cell phones as these device have their own pros and cons. Also, parents must keep a check on the use of cell phones by the students and warn them time to time in case of excessive use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-02 | shouvik ash | 58 | view |
- Some people think that ideal parents are strict disciplinarians who keep their children on the straight and narrow path with firm yet loving control. Other argue that ideal parents from loving bonds with their children through a relationship closer to fri 66
- Many students today have their own cell phones and take them everyplace they go. This becomes a problem when they bring them into classroom. Schools should completely ban the presence of cell phones in the classroom. 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 67
- A nation should require its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge andexperience to that field of study 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommends banning'.
Suggestion: recommends banning
... serious problem. Therefore, the author recommends to ban the presence of cell phones in the clas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this device' or 'these devices'?
Suggestion: this device; these devices
...per and judicious use of cell phones as these device have their own pros and cons. Also, par...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2932.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 611.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79869067103 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58107855584 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.382978723404 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 916.2 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5609539765 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3666666667 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63333333333 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532882391537 0.243740707755 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176966496607 0.0831039109588 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107422598156 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353292698636 0.150359130593 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068818906669 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.