The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to the
material progress and well-being of all other countries
Today is the world of globalisation where no country is self-sufficed. Every country depends on some other countries for its material progress and well being. However, the parameter of well being of different countries are different. The parameter for material progress for a developed country may be some cutting edge technology that brings add-on luxury to living standards of their people who are already leading a luxurious life. But for poor countries like Africa, the parameter of well being would be mere two time meal for every people over there. Now, bringing a novel idea of technology might be well being for one country but it can be hardly related to well being of other countries.
Taking example of United states, seeing past industrial revolution and already a developed country now feels need to reduce carbon emissions in their country. Over period of industrial revolution, they already have emitted so much of carbon into air that people are now not worried about industries setup and economic growth from industries. So at this time invention of carbon absorbers may be a material progress for US and acts as well being of this country. Antithetically, country like india in spite of having cities like New Delhi (one of the most polluted city of world) can't think of such carbon absorber as well being of this country. The current demand of this developing country is to be developed first. Economical growth is prior to any other factor. So carbon absorbers are acting like well being for one country but not for others.
However, many countries who are like United states (developed countries) facing problems of polluted air can take benefits of such device invention. Their material progress and well being are well defined by the use of such devices. Thus countries having common interests most often help in progress of such countries. Also, even if the interests are not common, still in some cases material progress of one country is connected to progress of other countries. For example, USA and India don't have common interest as far as carbon emission is concerned but in many ways industrial progress in USA has benefited india. Many jobs are outsourced from USA to india creating huge job opportunities and human resources in india in turn also help in progressing USA companies. Here, it shows well being of one country is connected to other countries as well.
We have seen that material progress and well being of country connected to all other countries as well is a bit extreme statement. This is true when common interests are served but some parameters for well being of one country may be different from other countries as we have seen in case of developed and developing countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-01 | ujjwalkrpl | 50 | view |
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus 50
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus' 45
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge andexperience to that field of study 50
- "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 16
- The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to thematerial progress and well-being of all other countries 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'material progress'.
Suggestion: material progress
...me invention of carbon absorbers may be a material progress for US and acts as well being of this c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... one of the most polluted city of world cant think of such carbon absorber as well b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: Economic
...oping country is to be developed first. Economical growth is prior to any other factor. So...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ell defined by the use of such devices. Thus countries having common interests most ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r countries. For example, USA and India dont have common interest as far as carbon e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies and human resources in india in turn also help in progressing USA companies. ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in some cases', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265306122449 0.240241500013 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.161224489796 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102040816327 0.0880659088768 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0979591836735 0.0497285424764 197% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0183673469388 0.0444667217837 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144897959184 0.12292977631 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0775510204082 0.0406280797675 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.61866823134 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0183673469388 0.030933414821 59% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0571428571429 0.0997080785238 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142857142857 0.0249443105267 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102040816327 0.0148568991511 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2731.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 457.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97592997812 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352297592998 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269146608315 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203501094092 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133479212254 0.132149295362 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61866823134 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 219.290929204 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433260393873 0.48968727796 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.845198479 55.4138127331 86% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7727272727 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6920593091 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.136363636 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.674092028746 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 47.6873881042 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.75735294118 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.603952306006 0.391690518653 154% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165949895286 0.123202303941 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114075753003 0.077325440228 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.507416294288 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147525160754 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249410384372 0.161403998019 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144542172555 0.0892212321368 162% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.464744518215 0.385218514788 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0281902650813 0.0692045440612 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.470719623857 0.275328986314 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366476138076 0.0653680567796 56% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.4325221239 182% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 18.0 7.22455752212 249% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.