“Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.”
Many in the world even today have a predisposed notion that Men and Women are not equally suited for many tasks because of their inherent physical differences. However true that in terms of evolution Men & Women do have glaring physical differences in terms of physical strength but in the modern society women have proved to be equally competent as men for many of the tasks. In the modern world where physical labour is not as important anymore, men and women are now equally suited for many tasks.
From a biological point of view, it can be said that women are not evolved for heavy physical labour. The physical differences in terms of upper body strengths, developed muscles a man is far more genetically evolved than a woman and is more capable of completing physicals tasks like manual labour. However, in times like today physical labour has already been replaced by machines. Therefore it doesn't seem wise to set physical labour as a benchmark for tasks conducted to see the competency of men & women.
Many of today's tasks involve intellectual abilities rather than physical abilities like in most of business fields and educational fields. Intellectual abilities have no effect of physical differences and it thus makes a fair competition to see who is more suited for the job irrespective of gender. For example, in all businesses today the ability to make decisions if favour of the business, networking and education level is required over physical attributes. A person with a higher educational degree, more work experience and the required skillset is more likely to get hired for a job in comparison to a person with better physical strength.
In fact, emotional strength is far more valued in the world we live in today over the physical strength. In the earlier times the work done by men were considered more valuable because the world was all about physical prowess, survival of the fittest was quite literal. In the contrary today a person who has the ability to make better social decisions and has better empathetic values is likely to survive.
Not just in business world but also in academic world women have been proving all theories wrong that say physical differences justify the value they put to the work. When computers weren't advanced enough to make cosmic calculations, scientists depended on women to calculate the numbers. This shows that women are equally competent for all tasks despite their inherent physical difference from men. People's role have changed as they no longer have to protect themselves and their societies against physical enemies and therefor innate physical ability has very little to do with survival in the modern world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | motherastronaut12 | 58 | view |
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... has already been replaced by machines. Therefore it doesnt seem wise to set physical lab...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...been replaced by machines. Therefore it doesnt seem wise to set physical labour as a b...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...vival of the fittest was quite literal. In the contrary today a person who has the...
^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ue they put to the work. When computers werent advanced enough to make cosmic calculat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05168539326 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6457276656 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465168539326 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2675097632 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7222222222 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24638016535 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982254660673 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803480759697 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15228239005 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836812071543 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.