A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is one of the most important factor to be successful. In this competitive world, education provides a direction to be pursued. Educating students from early ages help them to tackle infinite situations with cogent ideas and knowledge.
To begin with, students must be profusely curious and adamant to learn new concepts. Education provides knowledge and skills for a sophisticated job. However, there are colleges who do not focus on national curriculum. Schools are not preparing a student for job. They are responsible to bugeon student's talent and passion. For example, if a person wants to pursue his career in acting then the school is responsible for giving him a foresight for future. In addition, if he is forced to take educational subjects then he will eventually flunk. Leonardo Dicaprio is one of the finest actors of this generation. What if he had decided to pursue educational subjects before college?
Secondly, impeding students skills to study same national curriculum can lead to some deleterious effects. For example, student who is not capable of studying the curriculum can take some serious steps for passing the subjects. Venality and cheating during exams can be their motive to pass the examination.Thus, if acknowledging student abilities can make him more successful rather than encouraging him to take inappropriate steps.
However, there are few merits for a nation to have same curriculum until the students enter college. This implication can distinguish students's ability and indicate us where they stand. For example, Universities cannot distinguish a students ability without considering their marks. If there is an equal competition, the university can select students who are incisive and capable for their level of education.
In conclusion, though considering implications of natioanl cirriculum has benefits to determine students ability but eventaully hinders the dream of talented student in particular field.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
2024-04-18 | Marqueetim | 66 | view |
2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
- the first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 58
- Technology causes more problems than it solves 33
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions with cogent ideas and knowledge. To begin with, students must be profusel...
^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents talent and passion. For example, if a person wants to pursue his career in a...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...be their motive to pass the examination.Thus, if acknowledging student abilities can...
^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...mple, Universities cannot distinguish a students ability without considering their marks...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54304635762 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04351292462 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3862290886 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218087282273 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726297550617 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963109573679 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112081557183 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635244994759 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.