A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is the way of imparting knowledge and gaining skills. Formal education is one of many ways to serve this purpose. There has been debate among scholars on if a nation should made it mandatory for all of its students to study same syllabus until they enter college. The author of the prompt has stated that a nation should make it compulsory for all of its students to study same curriculum during their earlier age. I disagree with the author of the prompt. In fact, such compulsion will only degrade the quality of education and standard of student.
Firstly, if we make it compulsory for all students to study the same curriculum, the students will be forced to pursue subjects which they are never going to need in their career. For instance, why should a student intending to pursue his career in arts or history read the theories of quantum mechanics or even those of biology such as Mendel’s law of inheritance, and so on. It will only waste his time or even demotivate him. He may struggle and waste two to three years to complete those subjects which are unnecessary for his career. Instead, if he had opportunity to choose subject based on his future goal, he would definitely reach his goal earlier, and he might do very good in his field. So, requiring all the students to study the same national curriculum is no more than a burden to the students.
Secondly, the national curriculum is over generalized, and thus they fail to address the specific needs and capability of all the students. Some students are instinctively intelligent and may find it very easy to understand the depth of the curriculum. While, on the other hand, students who find it difficult to understand the very basics of the taught subjects, if have to go through same settings, and have to pursue same depth as that of the intelligent students, they may surely be demotivated and cannot excel in their career. So, students should be given liberty to choose the subject as per their interest and understanding rather than making it compulsory for them to study certain predetermined curriculum.
In conclusion, it may be tempting to believe that a nation forcing all its student to study same syllabus will bring homogeneity among the knowledge of students, and make the students' career bright and fruitful. However, rather than bringing homogeneity and helping students in developing their career, compelling them to study same course will only make them difficult to excel their intended career and also develop a deep schism in the level of knowledge among those who are intelligent and those who find it difficult to understand even the basic of the subject. Hence, a nation should enable the students to choose subjects based on their interest rather than forcing them a predetermined syllabus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Sock Inc A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are s 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90717299578 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69328566559 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445147679325 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7439170805 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.421052632 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9473684211 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378033902199 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132640791503 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146083516525 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255928752446 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826306571595 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90717299578 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69328566559 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445147679325 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7439170805 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.421052632 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9473684211 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378033902199 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132640791503 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146083516525 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255928752446 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826306571595 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.