A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum
until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most
compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is not only a measurement to foster youth and improve the society intellegence as a whole, but also a boost to enlighten mankind. The arguement suggests that students in a nation should study the same courses from elementary to highschool. Although it seems to be advantageous and reasonable to do so, I partially disagree with the statement.
Currently worldwide, the curriculum that pupils studying are a combination of various subjects, including language, mathematics, science, social studies, etc. Such course design has a fundamental goal: to ensure rudimental knowledge is deeply rooted to a youth. Afterall, it is not easy for a youngster to excavate the subject he/she is intersted in; by engaging micellaneous aspects of "cognitive stimulus", and incresing course difficulty through years of study, he/she will surely be able to find his/her strength and weakness, and therefore choose a future career that actually fits his/her talent. In addition, it costs much less for a nation to execute. By requiring students to study the same curriculum seems to be a terrific strategy.
However, every human is different, therefore it is not suitable to apply the same measurement to everyone. Known as the "King of Invention", Thomas Edison is one of the most well-known examples to contradict such arguement. He only received public education for three months, who later being dispelled directly from his principal. However, by treasuring his innate interest, he then found what he is good at: creativity. Throughout his life, he learned all by himself, and invented over 2000 items including typewriter, which brightens humanity. In retrospect, if he stayed in school in loath, tenchnology improvements may be delayed.
Last but not least, many careers have to be fostered since a very young age. Many soccer players like Lionel Messi started play since nine years old, and even moved to Spain to train systematically; Gymnastic players have relative short careers, hence it is crucial to practice since a very young age. Also, for those who has already made their mind, it is inappropriate to restrict what curriculum they should study. Strict execution for the same courses on everyone may encumber diversity and social values.
To conclude, I do not agree that a nation should require all students to study the same nation curriculum. Although it has its benefits and may be easier to apply for mass youth, we should consider the outliers that actually also pushes the era forward, and respect the education they really needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 70
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 66
- Passage In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowled
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 77
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat pupils studying are a combination of various subjects, including language, ma...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
... knowledge is deeply rooted to a youth. Afterall, it is not easy for a youngster to exca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29828850856 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98631011029 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59902200489 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8046040659 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.35 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198804700425 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655638937659 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902088471725 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121847810952 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793453089207 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.