A nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter the college.
The statement asserts that, nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. While the author's recommendation has merit from a normative standpoint, in deeper analysis, I find the recommendation indefensible. Below I will discuss the reasons of my stance.
A nation thrives through strengthening the educational infrastructure and a rigorous curriculum nationwide can play vital role in that strengthining. Many of us will comply with the statement that, nation reqires same curriculum for its students before they enter college. Obviously there are certain advantages of that type of initiatives. For example, nationwide same curriculum renders an uniform educational facility. Moreover, in today's world, before entering college, a student gain barely enough knowledge to decide on the specific field he should study. However, the problems of a common curriculum outweighs those benefit in a conspicuous way.
Implementing a national curriculum will be detrimental to the states and ethenic societies of the country and their culture, as the culture flourishes through practicing and learning of their individuality. Whereas a common curriculum does not count the statewise culture, geography, societal values rather makes a common ground counting the national importance. For example, a student of the hill tracks of Bangladesh needs to know the importance of his tribal culture, needs to withhold the values of his society, know the specific geographical characteristics of his state. But a common national curriculum will not take into account these facts.
Additionally, a national curriculum will be implemented and modified by the people of the government, thus it may distort the history and modifiy the lessons to gain political advantages. Who will ensure the transparancy of the curriculum for national interest? Sometimes, the people of govorning these issues focuses on personal prejudice and can make the main goal of the education distorted.
So, to conclude, we can say that, a nationwide curriculum is a good idea, but the problems associated with the implementation outweighs the benefit. So, before implementing that, we should make sure that, those specific issues have been solved before hand/
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 66
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the in 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 75
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity. 58
- "Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete."How would you rate the accuracy of the above statement? Support your position with reasons and examples. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...lum until they enter college. While the authors recommendation has merit from a normati...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ple, nationwide same curriculum renders an uniform educational facility. Moreover,...
^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a conspicuous way" with adverb for "conspicuous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mmon curriculum outweighs those benefit in a conspicuous way. Implementing a national curriculum wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
... those specific issues have been solved before hand/
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240310077519 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.134366925065 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100775193798 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0335917312661 0.0497285424764 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0439276485788 0.0444667217837 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124031007752 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0335917312661 0.0406280797675 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.15877669286 2.79330140395 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0180878552972 0.030933414821 58% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134366925065 0.0997080785238 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0335917312661 0.0249443105267 135% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00258397932817 0.0148568991511 17% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2271.0 2732.02544248 83% => OK
No of words: 345.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.58260869565 6.0361032391 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.463768115942 0.366273622748 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.35652173913 0.280924506359 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.28115942029 0.200843997647 140% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.188405797101 0.132149295362 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15877669286 2.79330140395 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 60.1181123824 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1666666667 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6666666667 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 54.8188405797 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.87804878049 1.64882698954 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473308935772 0.391690518653 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.078320038065 0.123202303941 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0574396804424 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.548124438162 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15735033884 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175783640027 0.161403998019 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181507528428 0.0892212321368 203% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.358364947612 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111538762209 0.0692045440612 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297792476579 0.275328986314 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149052806375 0.0653680567796 228% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.