A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer
Having the same curriculum for every student in a country may at first seem very promising, but every idea has its downsides. This would mean having a single board that decides the syllabus and organizes the exams. But it may be necessary to have different curriculums in certain situations.
To begin with, having a single board will reduce the problems for the people who set the papers for college entry exams, as they will not have to keep track of multiple curriculums. The entrance examinations will then be much fairer to every student in that nation, as this will ensure that every student has an equal chance to prove their mettle at this level.
Additionally, this method will also save the state's tax money. In a country with multiple boards, like India, a lot of assets are invested to ensure smooth functioning of these boards. Also, the cost creating many different courses for the training of the teachers can be avoided. Maintaining a single board will certainly reserve these assets for a different cause, like disaster mitigation.
Conversely, having a single committee decide the syllabus for all students in the nation may not be such a good idea. In a big country like India, every region has their own culture and educational needs, it will not be wise to teach a student living in the north-eastern regions a language like Kannada or a student living in the southern regions Assamese, even teaching Hindi, the national language to every student is not advisable. So, creating multiple boards that makes region specific curriculum is the best move in such a situation.
I would like to conclude this essay by saying that having a singular curriculum is definitely the better choice for regions which do not have a lot of cultural diversity, but if that is the case, opting for region-specific curriculum will be the best step.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | rookobay | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | LAGADAPATI VINAY | 33 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | zanzendegi | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | poiuy23567 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Eeshan | 50 | view |
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 58
- The following is an excerpt from a letter sent by the principal of Greenwood School to the parents of all incoming kindergarteners. "We have decided to institute a policy of all-day kindergarten, instead of half-day kindergarten, for all students at Green 66
- Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness. 50
- Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness. 50
- The following is an excerpt from a letter sent by the principal of Greenwood School to the parents of all incoming kindergarteners. "We have decided to institute a policy of all-day kindergarten, instead of half-day kindergarten, for all students at Green 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...f these boards. Also, the cost creating many different courses for the training of the teacher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'committee'?
Suggestion: committee
...igation. Conversely, having a single committee decide the syllabus for all students in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, may, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92675159236 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66981001433 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3264019932 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130628460049 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497613680425 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039583125601 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748883676136 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319282286934 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.