The children are future of a nation. They are the ones who going to run the nation and be responsible for it’s development in the future. To handle those responsibilities children need to be qualified enough to perceive them accordingly. Therefore, it is very important to form a strong base in their formative years. Education plays an important role in forming the basis of child’s future by not only helping their development at personal front, but it also plays a vital role in making them responsible citizens. Hence, providing all children with same benefits of education is very necessary. Thus, the curriculum being followed in a nation should be similar. However, nation should not impose curriculum blindly and strictly, schools must be provided with some liberty to alter it as per the needs of students so they could be provided with more benefits.
Having same national curriculum for all the students of a nation is having many positive aspects. Consider, For example, a student whose parents are either in defence or government service. Nature of parents job is is very transferable for such students. Their parents keep on being transferred from one city to another on regular basis as part of their job. As a result, students need to move from one school to another throughout their school life. Here comes the importance of having same national curriculum for all students. If it’s not, then for such students it would be a disadvantage as they would need to adapt to new curriculum, and once they adapt to it their parents might get transferred again. Hence, existence of different curriculum will always keep impeding progress and learning curves for these students. In my opinion, presence of common curriculum in a nation would smoothen school life of many such students without obstructing their learning and creativity.
Other positive aspect of having same curriculum for all students is the opportunity of providing them all with the same benefits of education.For instance, every students have to move to college after the school studies are over. We are living in the age of competition. Everyone needs to clear some entrance exams before being admitted to the college of their choice. In this instance, if some students are following a certain curriculum and others are following a different one, then students whose curriculum is closer to the syllabus of entrance exams would be benefited more than the ones whose curriculum is distant. Apparently all students won’t be equally benefited and hence these exams would be doing prejudice to them. For example, in India we have many education boards and also a national body to automate curriculum which is NCERT, but not all education boards follow it. Thus, for a student coming from Rajasthan board (one of the state board), it’s very difficult to compete for engineering entrance exams like JEE, where it’s easier for students from CBSE and ICSE boards. Thus, all students should possess same education and skills if they had to compete at same level. This could only be ensured if they are all provided with same curriculum guidelines.
However, a nation shouldn’t make schools to follow these guidelines rigorously, they must be provided with some liberty to make changes in their curriculums. Not all students have same interest and learning capabilities. Some are fast learners, while some are average and rest are extremely slow. Having same syllabus for all students with different capabilities and interests would somehow result in dropping their interest in subjects. To overcome such a situation and keep students motivated and interested in studies, schools must vary their curriculums.
Finally, on recapitulating I would emphasise that having same educational guidelines throughout a nation is a good idea. However, it shouldn’t restrict schools from moulding it to some extent to benefit students with different capabilities.
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 55
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 35
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...vernment service. Nature of parents job is is very transferable for such students. Th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...all with the same benefits of education.For instance, every students have to move t...
^^^
Line 5, column 939, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or a student coming from Rajasthan board one of the state board, it's very d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, finally, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3336.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 634.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.261829653 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01790360848 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85686704961 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421135646688 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1062.0 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5775400773 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2121212121 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60606060606 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303248667755 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968393978003 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861739123817 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187271654954 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550396776923 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.