Knowledge acquired in childhood is very important throughout the adulthood. A person's analytical skills can be molded easily at their young age, when learning will have perennial effects. In such powerful period of life, a nation should not force their students to study only their national curriculum but also encourage them to be open-minded in learning.
To begin with, when a nation restricts its students learning coverage area only to their nation's requirement, they impede the multiple oppurtunities available worldwide. If a nation is eminent in a particular sport, that doesn't mean that it should duress all of its students to participate in the same sport to produce more outstanding players. The nation should provide platforms where students can choose the paths they want. The real interest is the vital key for better results than the forced performance.
We can illustrate this with an example. Let's consider United States sports era. They have craze fans for baseball game all over the country, but their women's soccer team has won world level championships. This diversity is not possible if the nation has restricted their students on a particular game. We can expand the same concept to the countries like India where their national sport is Hockey but they have well reputation in other sports like Cricket. This clearly shows the advantage of finding real talents in various domains by not clinging on the national curriculum.
Furthermore, what happens when a nation only believes on their national curriculum? Like, what if a nation provides only their primary language to its students till they enter college? The young age is an effective time for consuming more knowledge like learning new languages, developing new skillsets and finding interests on sports area.
When the students are not provided with oppurtunities to utilize that powerful time to enhance themselves, they may not able to avail the career oppurtunties outside their nation. It is not only loss to the students, but also a great loss for a nation in diminished scope of inviting more knowledge into their nation. By adopting extrinsic curriculum out of their national scope will help to improve the country's growth.
In summary, a nation should not cling on their same curriculum and should not force their students to study them. Providing additional oppurtunities will help the nation along with student's wide scope of exposure.
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 42
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the st 66
- In 1939 David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell s Pulitzer Prize winning novel Gone with the Wind The movie proved to be among the most important in the history of world cinema To this day in fact it remains the American box office c 93
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 62
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: A person; Persons
...ery important throughout the adulthood. A persons analytical skills can be molded easily ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... is eminent in a particular sport, that doesnt mean that it should duress all of its s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...We can illustrate this with an example. Lets consider United States sports era. They...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24040920716 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7155079979 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5078867492 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2380952381 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390951875847 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131110501601 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10383798978 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241730434506 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728885586899 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.