A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
Curriculum is very important in shaping the future of a student. It guides a student through his journey in life and helps in developing the person he/she becomes in years to come. Hence, it is very essential to make this learning path favourable and adjusting to the student.
I would however disagree with the recommendation of a nation requiring its students to study the same national curriculum until they reach college. The minds of students at a very young age should be given freedom of thought. They should be allowed to choose their very own path based on their interests and things that make their minds think. Going through courses or a specific curriculum will not allow the students to develop an out of the box thinking and chasing their dreams. For example -- If a student is intrigued by computers, courses related to computers should be made more available to him rather than learning from a general set. If someone likes to paint and shape their realities in form of art, their imagination should not get restricted by the numerous courses he/she doesnot want to follow.
The curriculum should be rigid upto a certain extent considering everyone has to learn and know about the basic facts of life. But beyond those certain lessons it gets monotonous and restrictive for the students to not be given a choice. Eventually they won't be able to discover what they really want to do and might fail if given the choice to choose college based on preferences they have no idea about. They won't be able to make structured and desriable choices without exploring a lesson in depth.
Moreover, if a nation is diverse and covers a larger area of land, there may always be languages, history and contemporaries specific to that area. Hence, as a whole the students far from it would not benefit enough from having in depth knowledge or learning a whole language which is not mainstream throughout the nation. But the local population would benefit a lot learning about their region of existence.
Going forward the curriculum should be more adaptive in nature rather than being static over the course of the school journey. For example -- a group of students who perform exceptionally well in academics should be allowed to focus on the next level of difficulty and newer areas to explore. While students who are slow learners should be provided with courses which are at their own pace and helping them to learn accordingly. Hence, similar levels will not always meet the expectation of students.
The idea of having the same national curriculum is indeed good in some aspects. Having a similar curriculum allows students to grow with the similar teachings and thus removes disparity in education that one receives. It will allow all the students to learn and grow in a more structured manner. However, as mentioned my reasons above, it will not always be successful as not all students are the same and they will benefit from having dynamic curriculum to better understand their favourable direction and the dreams they want to chase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9515503876 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60718985061 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1508066615 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.458333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323590999099 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11293021353 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146397605262 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234340964207 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.304199146113 0.0667264976115 456% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.