The question about the necessity of the universal national curriculum has been raised quite frequently. Many people are still ambivalent about this issue since each point of view has its pros and cons. I mostly agree with this statement and my reasoning will be presented below.
First of all, the equality of students knowledge will be ensured with the help of the same national curriculum. In other words, if we consider the United States - no matter if a student is from Boston or Seattle, they will have the same general background. This will help to make the university admission process more fair. Since everybody has studied the same subjects, during the same amount of time, with the identical textbooks, their chances, which are dependent on the external factors, will be equal.
Secondly, it could simplify the government's control over the education field. For example, usually school teachers must take some courses to keep updated with the current trends in education and other topics. If there is no univeral curriculum. it is will almost impossible to make such seminars equally useful for all teachers since the material covered in their classes or time dedicated to it can vary greatly. Moreover, in the majority of countries pupils who are about to graduate must take final exams that are, more often than not, standardtized. Therefore, it it will be easier for the government to create a fair well- assesing test that every student would be able to complete sucessfully.
However, some people might argue that the same national curriculum will hurt cities' identities or it will make traditions and customs of certain areas be forgotten. Clearly, the naton-wide based curriculum cannot represent fully the peculiarities of all regions of the country, it is only able to give a short overview. Therefore, the advocates of this point of view argue that the local identity of each of thos areas may be lost while this unification process. Notwithstanding, I do not quite agree with that. The school's main purpose is to provide its pupils with general education, but there are also families, art schools and other institutions that are responsible for preserving and tranmitting the traditions and education the young generation.
In the final analysis, it is clear while the majority s still ambivalent when it comes to this issue. Nevertheless, I believe that the advantages of the creation and implementation of the national curriculum outweigh the cons of it sich it will ensure the equal chances of pupils after the graduation and simplify the contol in the education field.
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the p 66
- Dowsing 3
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations 83
- The Northern Land Bridge 70
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t trends in education and other topics. If there is no univeral curriculum. it is ...
^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...cs. If there is no univeral curriculum. it is will almost impossible to make such ...
^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...ten than not, standardtized. Therefore, it it will be easier for the government to cr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12705882353 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77414439797 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545882352941 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1039699114 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.95 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175765027212 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536399254776 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668694268793 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101604428366 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540159979755 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.