Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
It is rightly said that nature is our greatest resource and hence we should treat it as such. We, however, see often this resource being neglected in the name of development and industrialisation. Hence I strongly agree with the stance that nations should pass a law to preserve remaining wilderness areas and save this resource before it is lost forever.
A recent study has shown that due to depleting forests and natural habitats, more and more animals are leaving home and entring human establishments. Many reports of a sighting of dangerous predators in cities that have been established by eradicating some form of natural habitats have been growing rapidly. These sightings are often accompanied by some form of casualty or others. It is not the fault of these animals as they are left with the little place of their own and are often forced to enter the human establishments in search of food.
Even if the above seems insignificant, there is a far greater consequence of depleting wildlife and forests. We do not realise how much we depend on nature and wilderness for our own survival and we have started taking it for granted. Even the smallest disturbance in nature can have huge impacts. One of the major drivers of global warming is said to be the diminishing of forests.
And global warming is not something to be taken lightly. Global warming is already adversely affecting our season cycle. Not only that, summers are getting hotter, and winters are getting colder each year because of global warming. If we fail to check global warming in time, we may reach a point of no return, where our planet gets converted into a desert eventually, and humankind starts facing a threat of extinction due to shortage of food and water.
Hence before it gets too late, it is imperative to pass this law to ensure whatever wilderness and forests are left are preserved. This will not only help to preserve the natural habitats of the animals but also give us a better fighting chance against global warming.
People who differ from this opinion may argue that we cannot ignore the contribution of development and industrialisation in the betterment of our lifestyle, and hence this law is against improvements in human lifestyle. To these people I would say, isn't there other ways to improve human lifestyle that donot involve eradication of forests and wilderness, thus threatening the human existence? I would argue there are plentiful.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 54
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 54
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams Realty is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e of development and industrialisation. Hence I strongly agree with the stance that n...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...n due to shortage of food and water. Hence before it gets too late, it is imperati...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...lifestyle. To these people I would say, isnt there other ways to improve human lifes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96359223301 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80358508181 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533980582524 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9945830457 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195740169531 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526627167361 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592626746476 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951955499546 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726340924234 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.