The topic raises the controversial issue of whether an extrinsic knowledge and experience are required for a field to advance, which I cannot fully agree or disagree. Conspicuously, if we look at the statement we would agree to it because, the world around us which we see daily is based on coordination and relativity of different areas. But not in all the situations. We would look down how my reasoning is.
First of all, the field of study is very ambiguous, whether the selected field is an advanced or a novice. If we take an already developed area like electricity, we are producing electricity from eclectic sources like coal, water, air, solar and nuclear energy etc. which are used for homes, offices and industries. With the help of external knowledge about mechanical and automobile engineering, learning about the movement of car powered by petrol or diesel engines, we developed electric cars which are now popular from the brands like 'Tesla'. In addition these external knowledge and experience in another field engenders a inter-disciplinary field, by extension, giving rise to new innovations and advancements in the field.
However, this may not be the case in the field which is in budding stages. For example, Quantum physics is in rudimentary levels. Scientists are trying to establish the basic theory of the subject which can be taught to the students. Therefore in this case instead of gaining external experience and knowledge, first we must have the basics of the subject, which is here the advancement of the field. Advancements in the field or subject is relative to the present status of field.
Furthermore, not in all the cases external knowledge can give rise to advancements in the field or a new inter-disciplinary field. We may have knowledge about different areas and subjects, but we couldn't mix up all these and sometimes it is dangerous act. Each field has some principles and rules to be followed and in these inter-disciplinary areas, proper feasibility and simulation tests should be done before going to the practical applications.
In conclusion, the statement presented an extreme sentence, presenting 'No field of study can advance without external knowledge' which is wrong, if it would have been 'Some fields of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field' . Because we have seen above about the advancement is relatively dependent on the field we look at.
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.Write a res 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls around the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked 69
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok at the statement we would agree to it because, the world around us which we se...
^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... popular from the brands like Tesla. In addition these external knowledge and experience...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d experience in another field engenders a inter-disciplinary field, by extension,...
^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ct which can be taught to the students. Therefore in this case instead of gaining externa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ut different areas and subjects, but we couldnt mix up all these and sometimes it is da...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...xternal knowledge which is wrong, if it would have been Some fields of study can advance signif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e and experience from outside that field . Because we have seen above about the ad...
^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd experience from outside that field . Because we have seen above about the advancemen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16708229426 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09355938213 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513715710723 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7201954998 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338923192543 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110144801268 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103045043126 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211869276286 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968052273744 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.