No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Most fields of study are interrelated in some aspect and enable knowledge and advances to progress further. However, it is not always true and there is always exception to this principle as everything require a source.
The statement above does not consider that knowledge about mathematic is quintessential to understanding other disciplines. Indeed, our basic principles of mathematics such as the Pythagorean theorem is used in physics for instance to generate locations. For that matter, It is even used in GPS technology. Without a previous background knowledge, it would have been very difficult for important physicist such as Albert Einstein to advance the field and make groundbreaking discoveries. Another example would be Newton who observed an apple falling from a tree. It is from his mundane experience and his scientific background that he was able to make such deduction, and by doing so, defined gravity.
Furthermore, some subjects are not only interrelated but are indispensable for working in a profession. In fact, how could a physician conduct a proper examination and diagnosis of his patient if he did not use the physiology, anatomy and immunology that he learned during his training. Any sharp scientist who made a significant discover required an understanding of a myriad of fields. Pasteur for instance who discovered the pasteurization process not only understood microbiology, but also physiology and chemistry, to advance the medical field and truly impact the scientific and medicinal world.
Finally, while it is valid to claim that knowledge from various field is necessary, every new discipline has a unique source. Anything must have one origin. In the same way that earth with its rivers, its earth, its animals and its inhabitants share a common ancestors and properties, the earth started from one unique particle. Earth has not been created as complex and convoluted as it is but from a single unit that evolve. This principle applies to fields of study. Certainly, mathematics theorem must have been originated from a long thought process and examination. The languages which are disseminated throughout the world did, at its inception, start from a single sound. Often, it is by pure chance or pure experience that a new field is discovered, nevertheless, its beginning is certainly idiosyncratic.
Throughout history, whether in history, science or literature, fields are interrelated and provide a foundation for further advances and discoveries. Nevertheless, they will always be those tedious individuals intrigued about the origin of matter that will attempt to uproot the first identifiable source of things and who claim that for anything there is one unique creator. It is certainly what believing in God would mean.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | smithsonite79 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Kyunghwan Kim | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | FaylEAVE0920 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | tuktuki1311 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | wwwww | 66 | view |
- Society' roles rely not only in providing its leaders competitive skills within a growing economy, but to also teach them the importance of working with a team in order to be succesful in their endeavors. The argument claims that the society is incumbent 33
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. 83
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 66
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 83
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37701149425 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12552725107 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549425287356 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7839859849 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.695652174 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9130434783 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208958455454 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559512274139 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632108589966 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109369793299 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420277438065 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.