In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit it must be understandable to most people.
As the barrier between art and everyday life has been erased, and more and more people are more or less producing art themselves, the field of art closely connects to other fields, such as humanity, natural science, and pop culture. As it is not a mere argument, but a tendency of art itself, it seems plausible that the basic role and function of art is to merit the public for social justice and quality of life in general. The statement, as well, seems to underscore the value and ethics of art and continues to argue that it has to be easy to understand for the general public. Although I undoubtedly support the assumption that art should render certain social values, I do not fully agree with the presumption that it be understandable to most people for two reasons.
In fact, There are a plethora of art works that call for political action. For example, “I, Daniel Blake” is a an London based film screened in 2015 that depicts a life of a retired man who has struggle maintaining his life as the social policy does not give enough opportunity to those who don’t seem to be capable enough to produce “healthy, young labor”. It touches several political issues, especially those which are strongly related to labor issues, and feminism issues that are contemporarily being discussed. The moto and teachings are conspicuous that anyone who watches the film might ponder on the well-being of pedestrian people.
However, as it has become relatively easy to produce artworks with mild and agreeable contents due to the help of mass media and other technological developments in communication, it enables them to be involved in profit gaining market exchange and benefit the ones who posses enough capital. In other word, artworks that contain simple and bold ideas are keen to be consumed as mere entertainment, although the original intention of the producer was opposite to it.
Furthermore, producing artworks that are focused on making most of the people understand the contents may lead to another opposite result, which is causing laziness of actively thinking and trying to grasp the idea that belies the appearance. For example, most of the avant-garde trials during 1910s in Russia and 1960s in France were intended for experimenting a change of our habitual mindsets. Experimental works tend to disrupt the common sense and subvert our given beliefs and ideologies, allowing us to initiate new thoughts and eventually practice new sets of demeanors. Thus, even though these kinds of art seems to be esoteric at first glance, it is likely that we can fundamentally ponder on the times and space we reside on and propel ourselves to merit the public in our own hands. Art that is fully understandable on the spot, in contrast, may satisfy the public but won’t in particular merit their quality of lives.
In conclusion, we shall be aware of the fact that understandable art does not automatically relate to art that benefits and enhances the life of the public. It may instead used as a product of market exchange and laid in the middle of the living room of the most corrupted, powerful person in our times.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 83
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 66
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 70
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within the field 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 567, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...it has to be easy to understand for the general public. Although I undoubtedly support the ass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tion. For example, “I, Daniel Blake” is a an London based film screened in 2015 t...
^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
...tion. For example, “I, Daniel Blake” is a an London based film screened in 2015 that...
^^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on. For example, “I, Daniel Blake” is a an London based film screened in 2015 that...
^^
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to maintain'.
Suggestion: to maintain
... life of a retired man who has struggle maintaining his life as the social policy does not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1910s'.
Suggestion: during the 1910s
...example, most of the avant-garde trials during 1910s in Russia and 1960s in France were inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in general, in particular, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90960451977 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78281454685 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523540489642 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 820.8 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.731374998 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.352941176 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2352941176 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 5.21951772744 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28307091895 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922499625112 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592100521666 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143772550483 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742196778817 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.