Art is subjective. Art has no rules or definitions that it follows. Interpretation of art may vary from person to person. I would like to mostly disagree with the prompt that for gaining the credit it deserves the art must be comprehensible to 'most' people for the following two reasons.
Something that is understandable to most people is uncommon. In today's ever changing society a film or a novel that is not obscure to the majority of its audience is highly unlikely. The culture and understanding of people of each region differ widely. With globalization art is not only restricted within boundaries of a community, state or a country. There can be different perspectives to the same piece of art as well and one cannot say whether any individual is wrong or right. For instance, there was always ambiguity about the Monalisa's painting by Leonardo Da Vinci. Some scholars and experts have various understandings about what the art tries to convey whereas most of the other common people are just able to see it as a painting. This fact cannot take away the credit from the painting that it deserves.
Merit of art will be given on the basis of the idea and quality of art. Even if incomprehensible to some or many people, it does not necessarily mean a film or poem does not deserve appreciation. A poem or a novel written by literary authors often use rich language with a finesse in their way of producing their art. These details, while appreciated by the critics and scholars, will remain opaque to the majority of common people.
If the art is pellucid it will definitely gain more support and approval from the people. Nonetheless, appraisal from many cannot be treated as the main criteria for the art's merit. Merit of the art will be decided by the people, but one cannot guarantee that 'most' people will have the capabilities of admiring the sheer beauty of theater or literature. In my opinion art is best judged by the esoterics who have the profundity to absorb the story the artist is trying to convey.
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the super screen movie production company According to recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended super screen produced movies than in any othe 55
- Teacher s salary should be based on the academic performance of their students 16
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74787535411 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81442157297 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549575070822 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4663749303 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374213740452 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987688002904 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734241315365 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220028131284 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465278092536 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.