Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
Like base of the pyramid supports all the structure above it, similarly originality is required for supporting the other ideas.
It can't be said that originality is just putting old ideas together. If, there are no new ideas, then there won't be a base to support other inventions. I will support my this conviction that originality is just not putting old ideas together in new ways, it also means coming up with new and innovative ideas and something that's is not merely putting old ideas together.
Everyone knows about satellites, how satellites are helping to revolutionize the technological world and society and humankind. It is true that satellites launching procedure is amalgam of different technologies such as rocket propulsion, advancement of materials which can sustain high temperatures, etc. Is satellite launch procedure a invention ? Yes, it is. But can we say that satellite launch invention would have been possible without all the advancement and innovations mentioned above? No, that's is not true. Rocket propulsion is the core of Satellite launch operation, rocket propulsion is a true innovation and is not merely a putting old ideas together. Rocket propulsion was actually invented during World War 1. Yes, it was invented for launching weapons, but eventually it is currently used for launching satellites. This wouldn't have been possible without actually new invention of rocket propulsion. So, yes, true inventions are required to make new inventions in future. But just putting old ideas together is not the only definition of an Originality.
Secondly, everyone knows about internet, we use it daily more than anything else. Internet was invented was DARPA, a military research organization of USA. It was invented for a totally different purpose. It was invented for communication between different branches and the army personals. This was a new thing, a completely new invention. This is a original invention which lead to the development of internet. Internet development wouldn't have been possible without DARPA developing it. So, Originality does mean developing new things also, it is not just taking some old ideas and putting them together and come up with new stuff.
In some countries, Railway is the lifeline of the connectivity. Could railways have developed without development of engine technology ? No, not at all. Railway development was possible because of engine and other related technologies development. These base technologies were required to develop the railways. Yes, railway is also an invention, but it wouldn't have been possible without invention of true ideas, something unique, never thought before and something which is just not putting old ideas together.
So, originality doesn't only mean putting old ideas together. Originality also means, developing something new and something that is never though before and something that is just not like a lego game.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | amruta3097 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | mb94 | 33 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | devjoshi | 57 | view |
- You have the opportunity to visit a foreign country for two weeks.Which country would you like to visit? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice. 43
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 63
- Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they becomemore efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-dayservice in 1970 to 20 cents 77
- Topic- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion. 78
- The country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade deficit problem by lowering the price of sugar its primary export Such an action would make Sacchar better able to compete for markets with other sugar exporting countries The sale of Sacchar s sugar 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...red for supporting the other ideas. It cant be said that originality is just puttin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...red for supporting the other ideas. It cant be said that originality is just puttin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... new and innovative ideas and something thats is not merely putting old ideas togethe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...res, etc. Is satellite launch procedure a invention ? Yes, it is. But can we say ...
^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nt and innovations mentioned above? No, thats is not true. Rocket propulsion is the c...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 839, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...tly used for launching satellites. This wouldnt have been possible without actually new...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 883, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...dnt have been possible without actually new invention of rocket propulsion. So, yes, true inv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 980, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ons are required to make new inventions in future. But just putting old ideas together is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 326, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...als. This was a new thing, a completely new invention. This is a original invention which lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 349, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng, a completely new invention. This is a original invention which lead to the de...
^
Line 6, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...pment of internet. Internet development wouldnt have been possible without DARPA develo...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...ble because of engine and other related technologies development. These base technologies we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s, railway is also an invention, but it wouldnt have been possible without invention of...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... old ideas together. So, originality doesnt only mean putting old ideas together. O...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, as to, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2475.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.403930131 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97212236325 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438864628821 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1147313536 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.34375 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3125 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.83258426966 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324536375686 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799031219536 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110046532454 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196370345793 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13199016221 0.0667264976115 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.