In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly overrated. We need more generalists-people who can provide broad perspectives.
The prompt claims that in this modern age, more generalists are needed for broader perspective since specialists are highly overrated. I disagree with the generalists' part of the claim. There may be two perspectives at every discussion. One is specific, other is general. In this technological era, without specific details it is very tough to go further ahead. Generalization can do very little in this age.
Firstly, there are more diversified disciplines than ever happened. Say for example, old mechanical engineering now is divided into various specific departments. Such as, aeronautical engineering, naval engineering, rocket engineering, robotics, industrial production engineering etc. These specific departments are now discussed in details by focusing into more specific courses. Such as naval engineering can be divided into construction sector and design sector. Someone may design cargo ships, someone may concentrate on warships, or someone on yachts. One can not think about generalization on this mechanical engineering. Same things happened at philosophy, biology, sociology etc.
Secondly, In medical we need specialists on eye, dental, cardiac, lungs etc. Without these specifications, we will be at risk when we go to a general doctor who can give prescriptions on every disease. So, specializations can not be overrated. Rather, we need more specialists.
Thirdly, generalizations can be wrong idea at some sector. We should concentrate on specific details. In many sectors such as engineering, medical, we should use empirical formulas rather than general one. Otherwise, our results can be wrong and we have to pay a great cost.
However, many people promote the notion that specific details are complex rather generalizations are more easy to work. They can think about the theory of everything. One theory can explain the world. But these people overlook the fact that at a specific sector one can concentrate easily on his/her specific interest and they can be more successful.
In conclusion, I have argued specialists are more needed than generalists in this modern era. This view will become more dominant in the coming century at every sector. The issue may not be resolved to everybody's satisfaction, but in the long run, promoting specialists than generalists will lead to the betterment of all of involved.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- In our time specialists of all kinds are highly overrated We need more generalists people who can provide broad perspectives 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d at philosophy, biology, sociology etc. Secondly, In medical we need specialists...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50828729282 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19430676968 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4319028336 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.7586206897 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4827586207 23.4991977007 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.06896551724 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 19.0 4.83258426966 393% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245289450677 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668819245194 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602582811775 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138172984806 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551932065516 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.79 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.