As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
What is not always obvious in discussions of this issue, is that man has been relying on technological solutions to their problems from the very beginning of their existence. Since he used tools and applied methods to hunt, farm or defend himself, technology was always employed to assist him in addressing his needs. It is just the nature of the problems that technology solves, that has changed today.
And perhaps the answer to this question might be clearer when one thinks of what type of problems technology is used to solve today. Even with advanced artificial intelligence solutions, machines are used to solve problems that are completely structured or call for an objective solution, which is actually a limitation of the fact that their thinking processes must be designed and defined in detail by a human. Unstructured problems that involve more complex ways of thinking are still left to humans to solve.
It could also be argued that, even if technology is used to solve many of the problems humans were formerly forced to solve themselves, new problems and new challenges have emerged as a consequence. Technical systems are not always failsafe or dependable. They require constant monitoring, maintenance and development, which they might be even more challenging than the problems the system is used to solve.
On the other hand, it might be true that people would probably be unable to cope with problems formerly solved by their ancestors but solved now with the help of technology. For example, people in business and management are nowadays using decision-making software to help them analyze a business problem and evaluate alternative solutions. Without this software, managers might not be able to solve these problems themselves just as effectively. However, this might be related not to the problem itself but the context in which a solution is needed. Managers would be able to make decisions for themselves a decade ago, but the time and risk constraints of these decisions were different.
To sum up, it is not true that nowadays technology provides a solution to every problem. Many problems are solved with help of technology, but new problems and challenges, probably even more demanding mentally, have emerged for man to solve for himself.
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wi 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 37
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 66
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, still, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1590296496 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82462037261 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504043126685 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0963275457 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167822639785 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621998876901 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362989813091 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10607288727 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334024355292 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.