As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Many people argue that people have become too dependent on technology. People rely on cars to get to different places, and they rely on spell check in order to make sure their papers are grammatically correct. Some claim that due to the technological dependency that is on the rise, people’s minds will deteriorate. However, if can be argued that while laziness will increase with technological reliability, the human mind will still stay intact.
With growing technology, more people will become lazy. This statement however doesn’t indicate that people will lose their mental capabilities. For example, now that there is the development of a GPS, many people do not know how to use maps and read directions from a map. People solely rely on a GPS in order to get places. However, that doesn’t mean that people aren’t capable of learning how to use a map. They are still mentally capable. They just don’t know how to and they don’t need to because they have a GPS. People still have all the same brain power to learn, just the convenience of a GPS has allowed them to focus their attention on other things. Through the convenience of technology, people will get lazy, but ultimately their brain power will still remain the same.
Furthermore, some people would claim that laziness will result in using the brain less, which would ultimately lead to detonation of the mind. While that may be a concern, human happiness depends on productivity. In many different psychological studies, people who are a productive member of society are typically happier and have less mental illnesses than those that don’t produce within a society. The laziness that is developed due to technology will shift people’s focus to different problems of the world. For example, now that people have to spend less time figuring out maps and how to get to places more quickly, they can spend that extra time they now have focusing on something more important. By using technology convienently, the brain will still be pushed more than ever. People won’t have to learn the trivial things that technology can take care of, and can now focus on producing more advanced systems. So the concern of people becoming too lazy that their minds deteriorate shouldn’t be a huge concern, as people always want to move forward and better themselves.
The invention of technology was intended to increase productivity, rather than to allow people to not think. People will always work on becoming better and smarter, and the use of technology just allows more time in the day for people to spend on less trivial things. Whether it is using a car to get somewhere that is faster than walking, a GPS to navigate rather than a map, or a stove to cook rather than making our own fire, technology is there to make people think more about the important things and spend less time on the small irrelevant aspects of life.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 79
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n happiness depends on productivity. In many different psychological studies, people who are a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, all the same
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97154471545 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73207629138 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455284552846 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9391077062 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.916666667 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29166666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206407405594 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725703959779 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461745764363 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1454559077 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207371869548 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.