As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement argues that if people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, their ability to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. In contrast I have a different opinion over this matter and actually feel that technology is helping humans to think more creatively.
Firstly, I believe human are most successful in building technology to automate trivial and laborious tasks and not intellectual ones. Appliances which we use on daily basis saves us from performing manual labour. Also that time is far away or unlikely to occur where Artificial Intelligence will be used on day to day basis to solve real scientific and social problems on their own without human intervention.
Secondly, having technology that human invented for himself to do all the repetitive jobs he/she now can focus more on non trivial problems and solve them for greater good. If one can find solution to such non trivial problem and build technology to mimic the solution, will only allow people to move forward and take up new challenges with the help of this technology.
Thirdly, I believe technology alongside a human brain are ought to create miracles. Human’s creative ideas with speed and faultless nature of technology will only raise thinking standards rather than deteriorate it.
In conclusion, humans with the help of technology are far more creative than ever. One should rely on technologies that are already built to solve certain problems and concentrate on finding solution for other which are not yet solved.
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public HealthCouncil."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantlyreduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearbyEast Me 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling r 76
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 41
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Since we are famou 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... themselves will surely deteriorate. In contrast I have a different opinion over this ma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...saves us from performing manual labour. Also that time is far away or unlikely to oc...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2 0.240241500013 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.17358490566 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.116981132075 0.0880659088768 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0981132075472 0.0497285424764 197% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0415094339623 0.0444667217837 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116981132075 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0301886792453 0.0406280797675 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73998982202 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0490566037736 0.030933414821 159% => OK
Particles: 0.00377358490566 0.0016655270985 227% => OK
Determiners: 0.0339622641509 0.0997080785238 34% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0301886792453 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0188679245283 0.0148568991511 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1531.0 2732.02544248 56% => OK
No of words: 248.0 452.878318584 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17338709677 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.58838876751 86% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346774193548 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286290322581 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213709677419 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149193548387 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73998982202 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 219.290929204 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608870967742 0.48968727796 124% => OK
Word variations: 63.9848172032 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5454545455 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5009947842 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.181818182 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.674092028746 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 51.1744868035 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.10843373494 1.64882698954 67% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501249410767 0.391690518653 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110454372812 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0699001814338 0.077325440228 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638057158864 0.547984918172 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13604894331 0.149214159877 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206315517538 0.161403998019 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128179022883 0.0892212321368 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.218156747347 0.385218514788 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0369743366525 0.0692045440612 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298576040912 0.275328986314 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114130155428 0.0653680567796 175% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.