As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human dependence on technology is increasing every day. From smartphones to driver less cars technology has become an integral part of our life. But I do not agree that dependence on technology leads to deterioration in human ability to think. In fact I think it has helped humans to augment their thinking capability.
With advancement in technology people now have more time in their hand to do more important things. Routines that were redundant and required physical labor, like integrated circuit manufacturing, are now done using robots allowing people to spend their valuable time on designing the ic's to be more efficient. This requires the person to think out the various possibilities and find out the best solution. Another such example is the use of computer for data processing in industries like the finance industry. Had there been no computers it would have taken human a lot of time to make sense of the data. With computers the task becomes much more easier to complete thereby allowing the worker to focus on how to put the trends from the data to a better use.This way people are left with time to handle more important issues and developing current technology further in fields like medical surgery where technological advancements can help toward leading long healthy life.
Also the processing of realizing the technology in itself requires great brain storming. Its is however true that sometimes people may take technology for granted, but this no way affects human thinking. In fact it is more important to not think about things that have already been developed, but about further advancements that can be achieved. From the above examples it can be infered that relying on technology does not degrade human thinking capability.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...a. With computers the task becomes much more easier to complete thereby allowing the worker...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 760, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...he trends from the data to a better use.This way people are left with time to handle...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...help toward leading long healthy life. Also the processing of realizing the technol...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'i think', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247557003257 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.201954397394 0.157235817809 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0912052117264 0.0880659088768 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0586319218241 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0390879478827 0.0444667217837 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114006514658 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0749185667752 0.0406280797675 184% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.75568987774 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0488599348534 0.030933414821 158% => OK
Particles: 0.00651465798046 0.0016655270985 391% => OK
Determiners: 0.0749185667752 0.0997080785238 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0162866449511 0.0249443105267 65% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0162866449511 0.0148568991511 110% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1755.0 2732.02544248 64% => OK
No of words: 289.0 452.878318584 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07266435986 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356401384083 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280276816609 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200692041522 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145328719723 0.132149295362 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75568987774 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 219.290929204 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570934256055 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 60.0758669966 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6428571429 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9505746912 59.4972553346 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.357142857 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.6705388038 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.45652173913 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404594275598 0.391690518653 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1230527587 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0570039681242 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.501026707709 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111026090579 0.149214159877 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155478934613 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813643622353 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.286364022883 0.385218514788 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0391542432314 0.0692045440612 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267768827324 0.275328986314 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104296924594 0.0653680567796 160% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.