As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate (Pick a side and surport it)
The world has now become a global village as a result of the advancement in technology. Information is now at the finger tip of everyone with internet access. I strongly disagree with the statement that the ability of human to think for themselves will deteriorate. With the world at the fingertip, everything can be found by searching the internet. This will in turn lead to humans being apathy when in comes to thinking when they can just find it online.
In 2018, a final year student of a university in Nigeria was reprimanded reason because the project he presented to his department was found to be a duplicate of another person’s project from another year. It was reported that the student searched through the internet and found an already published work which he then edited and presented it as his own. With this instance, it shows that the human ability to think for themselves is deteriorating because with a search online the required information can be searched and found with little stress.
In the absence of technology, when students are given assignments, they have to first think about the direction and draft out a plan for their research before going to the library to get the resources needed. Nowadays, student just do a “copy and paste” of the assignment question on the internet and copy the result it brings out. Resources online which include google search engine, YouTube and so on have greatly influenced the people and because of the easily found information there, it has in turn reduced the rate at which people think for themselves.
The advancement of technology has greatly impacted the way people live and think for themselves. Humans now prefer to first know what the internet has to say about a topic than first thinking it through by themselves.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Pick a side and surport it 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90789473684 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70339506461 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8305157881 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69230769231 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162075053033 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653112052101 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788049244283 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105441114348 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029465659408 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.