As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is human's nature to look for shortcuts. The evolution of human society and the development of technology are both motivated by this human characteristic. From ancient time to the information era now, people overcome the severe environment by inventing new tools and technologies, and utilize them to ameliorate the surroundings to make the world a better place for living. In my opinion, technology is not only making our lives easier but also stimulating people to explore the world and find solutions for more complicated problems. Hence, I partially disagree on the statement since though people are relying more on technology, it does not absolutely deteriorate human's ability to think.
From a historical perspective, technology is pushing the society moving forward like the engine to an automobile. From the several significant steps in the development of human history, one can observe the paramount role that technology takes. Frist of all, the invention of lighters provides the nessecity for human race to survive in frezzing winter and enjoy cooked food to avoid deadly virus. The emergement of this technology is based on the basic needs of human race so that people are urged to invent tools to make fire fast and easily. From this point of view, though people are relying more and more on such basic inventions as lighters, bulbs, wells, microwaves and so forth, which are invented by the creative thinking of human, it in turn becomes the strong motivation for people to think further and free people's mind. In addtion, even in our era when the society has been so developed that people are released from tedious and laborous duties, technology is still pushing us to move further as to solve new problems raised by new technologies. Admittedly, one is relying even more on technology nowadays as if technology has become part of life. Consider, for example, will anyone be pleased to live in a society without electricity, the internet, laptops, GPS and washing machines? Apparently, it is difficult for us to give up the cozy life brought by technolgoy. Therefore, when new problems pump up, people have no choice but to solve them by creative thinking which on the other hand make the technology more advance. For instance, when people are first convinced that the Earth is round and only a small part of the universe, scientists started to find ways to explore the outerspace which eventually brought satetilles and space flight into reality. In short, one can find mutual stimulation and benefits between technology and the ability of humans to think for themselves in human history.
Zooming down to a narrow scope, technology is also performing a beneficial role from an individual perspective. Unless living isolated, one, on the one hand, depends on technology for survivial and development; on the other hand, thinks scruplrously and freely to solve problems caused or comes along with the techniques. In this information generation, even primary students know how to use microwave to warm food and use the internet to search for information. Mastering relevent and advance technology becomes an essential skill for one's career path and everyday life. Moreover, people are thinking creatively based on existing technology to solve problems. Take the instance noodles as an example, people have been eating boiled noodels for centuries since it was created. However, a Japanese lady found it unconvenient to take for travelling so that she fried it and made it instant noodles which benefit millions of people in the world. Therefore, even ordinary people can use their creative thinking to solve problems and adopt technologies to enjoy a better life.
Admittedly, people are indeed depending on technologies for daily living and professional work. Nonetheless, technology never hampers the ability of humans to think instead it releases people from repeative work to spend more time on crucial and complicated problems and thus making the world a nicer and better place.
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 62
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through the 83
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants powerful anti aging and immune system boosting compounds Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day the greater the benefits Green tea however contains moder 49
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- he following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...y a better life. Admittedly, people are indeed depending on technologies for daily living and pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'apparently', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in short', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258379888268 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.166201117318 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0824022346369 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0614525139665 0.0497285424764 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0279329608939 0.0444667217837 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118715083799 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0502793296089 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82824356579 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0432960893855 0.030933414821 140% => OK
Particles: 0.00279329608939 0.0016655270985 168% => OK
Determiners: 0.0782122905028 0.0997080785238 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00558659217877 0.0249443105267 22% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0125698324022 0.0148568991511 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 4009.0 2732.02544248 147% => OK
No of words: 648.0 452.878318584 143% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18672839506 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04537849152 4.58838876751 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393518518519 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291666666667 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217592592593 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151234567901 0.132149295362 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82824356579 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 219.290929204 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 62.0580938552 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1497947766 59.4972553346 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.481481481 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 53.1666666667 51.4728631049 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.67213114754 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559196936423 0.391690518653 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.095746511166 0.123202303941 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0684911878333 0.077325440228 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.479470282006 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130559612957 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211449632294 0.161403998019 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081140064295 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.556342174535 0.385218514788 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104564692215 0.0692045440612 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.425356854946 0.275328986314 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557434119456 0.0653680567796 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.4325221239 182% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 19.0 7.22455752212 263% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 26.0 13.5995575221 191% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.