As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of
humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Today, We are living in a world where we are surrounded by technology. But keep saying that ability of humans to think for themselves has deteriorated and I completely disagree
with the statement. Technology makes our work easier and more efficient. It even increases our imagination because we get more knowledge with the help of that our mind thinks of more ideas
that help us in development.
In an older time when we have no technology to communicate with each other so easily and instantly, we wait a long period for the response that keeps work on hold with the help of
technology we discuss things faster and it makes development efficient For example, if you remember in Mumbai there is heart transplant was done for a kid they require that within 16 hours
so with the help of a computer hospital connected and they were able to find that and with the help of technical devices doctor was able to transplant the heart and save the life of that
kid, nowadays that far technology came.
Nowadays, people start relying on technology, especially in urban areas they want to do as much physical work as possible and that's for machines are made but completely get dependent
on them starts making people lazy. But that is not a problem with technology so some people were lazy before technology also and like that today also some people are lazy. So it depends
on people how are involved with technology in their life. Some people work efficiently with the help of technology and save time they think of new ideas
and new changes that they can make in their life.
If you discuss in any aspect today technology making us thing more reliable for us. Today we can do education where we want even if we go over the sea to a different country for our education
because we have that level of transport today. Lots of researcher goes different country to research important topics and working together make research more interesting and
faster they can relate things fast they understand each other very well. So technology making things reliable. Even students get a chance to work with the scientist whom they want to
work with the help of technology.
In the conclusion, I will say technology help the world to develop faster and it helps human to think about new technology and other innovation before that even they do not have an imagination
for that because with the help of technology, they get different aspects of work with the help of that they get different ways of thinking about the same work. I completely disagree
with the author's statement that the ability of humans to think for themselves is not deteriorating even if it is improving.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp of that our mind thinks of more ideas that help us in development. In an ol...
^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lant the heart and save the life of that kid, nowadays that far technology came. ...
^^^
Line 10, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...o as much physical work as possible and thats for machines are made but completely ge...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es are made but completely get dependent on them starts making people lazy. But t...
^^^
Line 12, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy and save time they think of new ideas and new changes that they can make in th...
^^^
Line 15, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to a different country for our education because we have that level of transport ...
^^^
Line 16, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ether make research more interesting and faster they can relate things fast they ...
^^^
Line 20, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat even they do not have an imagination for that because with the help of techno...
^^^
Line 22, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e work. I completely disagree with the authors statement that the ability of humans to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79094827586 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59449014732 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424568965517 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 134.360042772 60.3974514979 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.9375 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.97078651685 362% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246108365601 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105600564362 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769234546256 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087008529979 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778396680922 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.