People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the reasons for which the statement may or may not be true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In today’s modern world, where most of the countries are enjoying the liberaties and rights provided by democracy, peoplt should definetly question the rules of authority rather then simply accepting the decision passively. As a fundamentals of democracy, people of a nation elect their government and it well within their rights to question the decisions of the government. What good of a democracy is if the representative of people itslef is not answering to its people. The intent of questioning the governement is not to undermine their policies or decisions, but to make them more tailoreed to the needs of the common people. This further bolster the root of democracy in the country.
The basic 3 rules of fairly-elected democratic government is a t government : o the people, for the people and by the people. The part ‘for the people’ is clearly meant to provide a fair chance question each and every policies and decisions taken by the government. This allows the governments to be in check and answerable to people. As a citizen of the country and diligents tax payers it is our right to question that wheter the policies which are being formed are they favourable to us, is our money being used for fair and justified purpose. We as the citizen have the power to drive the course of policy making the ruling parties. We can drive to make policies for better infrastructure, better hospitals or better education. Keeping a government answerable to us, keeps them on the right track of thinking for betterment of the people.
These check and question are also necessary to keep the social evil of corruption away. History is the evidence, that many countries where government where not in check have turned from democracy to autocracy. As an instance, few decades back Pakistan during the tenure of their president at that time, Mr. Parvez Musaraf, they had to go through same course. The people did not keep a proper check on policies of government and as a result, military overtook the country, and the country had to go through a tragic phase. Although, democracy was restored but this incident clearly pushed back the progrss of the country to several yet. Pakistan is not the only example, same kind of situtation happended in Iraq, which eventualy led to very unfortuante state of extreme terrorism.
Although, keeping a check on policies of government is important but at the same time we should make sure that opposition parties are not misusing this fundamental right for their benefit. A necessary and vigilant check should be in place to make sure opposition is not throttling the ruling party’s action plan in extreme debatres and political conundrums. To make sure this is not the case, the oppositon should also be under consistent questioning along with the ruling party. Their should be a proper time frame to do all kind of questioning and beyond which the agreed upon plan should be implemented, so that its not all just talk and some real progress is taking place as well.
In a nutshell, in order to keep a nation’s growth on right track, in order to align it with aspiration of its majority of population, questioning the policies of the government is extremely important rather then simply accepting them paasively. At the same time it should be make sure that oppostion does not misuse this important power and also allows the ruling parties to take actions as well rather then just discussions and dileberations.
- Company X has just switched to a four day workweek mandating that employees work ten hours per day from Monday to Thursday instead of eight hours per day from Monday to Friday Although the policy is new Company X claims that the policy will help to increa 63
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 62
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... question the rules of authority rather then simply accepting the decision passively...
^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fundamental' or simply 'fundamentals'?
Suggestion: a fundamental; fundamentals
...ly accepting the decision passively. As a fundamentals of democracy, people of a nation elect ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...overnment is extremely important rather then simply accepting them paasively. At the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'made'?
Suggestion: made
...aasively. At the same time it should be make sure that oppostion does not misuse thi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 404, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... parties to take actions as well rather then just discussions and dileberations.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2886.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 583.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95025728988 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79974288756 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43910806175 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 895.5 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.454454355 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2916666667 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142845713753 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428411813729 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319130372126 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869983616534 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290805167267 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.