People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is true that people should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively because only then any oppressing rule would be brought down. Questioning the authority has led to a lot of drastic changes in the world in the form of revolutions. But this does not call for every rule to be questioned, some rules have to be followed if it is for the greater good, if the authority is not a dictatorship and the rule is something that the citizens need t adhere to for the good functioning of the society.
Questioning laws have made great changes. This has led to revolutions. The French Revolution and the freedom movement of India against the British Raj are examples of this. The British Raj imposed tyrannical laws and curbed the freedom of Indians and made them pay excessive taxes. The people stood up against these rules and Mahatma Gandhi led the Non-Co-operation movement against the British where people refused to blindly follow or coperate with the rules imposed.These years were filled with hardships and starvation. It was not until the Britishers were questioned on their methods did the situation become better. Questioning them lead many people to jails and they were killed for raising their voices. But the Indians led by Mahatma Gandhi voiced their opinions in a non-violent way by simply refusing to cooperate. Many Dictators have showed up in History like Adolf Hitler who made rules that simply made no sense. Unnecessary killing of a particular race was unwarranted and such rules were oppressing which needed to be stopped.
Many of the governments are democratic, where the government is as Abraham Lincoln says "For The People, Of the People and By the People". The rules made by authorities are for the well-being of the people. Elections are held where people choose their representatives in the government. So when a decision is made only, if the majority of the MPs vote for a rule, does it get passed in the parliament. So raising voices and questioning every single rule the government makes will lead to an unstable government where there will be fights for every decision. The questioning of authorities for every decision made will make them lethargic because they will have to put extra effort into making people understand why it is beneficial as a result the working of the government slows down. Also, what one person views as a good rule might seem as a bad one for others. So now what happens, there will be lots of discussions and fights about what is to be done. Take the example of Section 377 which was recently decriminalised by the Government of India, this led to many people supporting the law and man people opposing it, due to which we were able to see a lot of rallies and strikes everyday. This definitely took a toll on the functioning of the government.
Looking back on History we find that only when people question authorities have major changes occurred. But would this be possible if only few people raises their voices? The answer would be definitely no. If the government was a democratic one their views would be simply ignored, if it was a communist one they maybe punished severely as happens in China, Afghanistan. Also some rules are meant for the greater good and they have to be followed without questioning them. For example the rule of wearing uniforms to school is a rule many students would not like and want it to be removed, but this rule was made taking into consideration where students might be bullied or abused based on their economic background. So wearing uniforms would only help everyone.
In essence I agree that people should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively as long as the rules are not something that are very non trivial that can be accepted without any questioning which warrants that the society function peacefully without any fights.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 66
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing an 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 26
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ians and made them pay excessive taxes. The people stood up against these rules and...
^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...llow or coperate with the rules imposed.These years were filled with hardships and st...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1196, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ble to see a lot of rallies and strikes everyday. This definitely took a toll on the fun...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...erely as happens in China, Afghanistan. Also some rules are meant for the greater go...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, well, for example, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 42.0 19.5258426966 215% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3248.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 665.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88421052632 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07814867018 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73607524578 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431578947368 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1026.9 704.065955056 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9893406482 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.774193548 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4516129032 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.51612903226 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207857681038 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576135895717 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542544278158 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148964858956 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525485996231 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.