People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Poor decision makers often make decisions based on emotion. When their decisions prove to be wrong, they try to justify their decisions with logic. Excellent decision makers usually take quite a different approach from this.
First of all, taking the best decision often requires a certain thought process. We need to first examine the cost-benefit analysis of our decisions. More than often, when we try to think logically, we consciously or subconsciously make a decision in this way. This is the best approach to solve our quotidian matters as well as make our important decisions. For example, suppose one wants to buy a house. The logical way they should make their decision would be to first examine cost-benefit analysis. In this way, they can find out whether buying a house at that time would wise or imprudent.
On the other hand, when we make our decisions based on emotion, we might not contemplate the consequences of it. Let's examine our buying a house scenario. If the person somehow manages to buy the house taking out huge loans and mortgages at that moment just because it is his/her dream to have a nice house, later on he/she may face hard time becuase of it. Even if then they try to justify their decision, we can certainly observe that their decision has not been the best.
In conclusion, we can say that excellent decision makers make decisions based on logic, not on emotion. This way they can analyze the best outcome of their decisions. So people who do the opposite of this are poor decision makers, for sure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 77
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 63
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...not contemplate the consequences of it. Lets examine our buying a house scenario. If...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81954887218 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5358083386 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533834586466 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5725293491 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.4117647059 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359477690724 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137144671531 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142923624917 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279675275731 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14328999881 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.