People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Good decisions are based on multiple characteristics such as the integrity and logic behind the decision, success that follows after the decision, and the other multitude factors. However, decisions that are solely based on the emotions can often be the most honest, logical and without the superficiality.
Decisions that are made out of emotions in an instant period shows the true intergrity of the decision maker. For instance, the children are often been punished by their parents for wrongdoings. And often the punishments and scolding that children have to endure comes out of the parents instaneous emotional decision as they witness their offsprings negative behavior. In this case, if parents were given the time to think about the punishment for their kids they may not have given the punishment with the same intensity. Rather, they will make more logical decision and less of the emotional one. In this scenario, it is possible that the parents would rather harm their kids for not giving the desirable punishment to correct their mistakes. In such case, parents are more better decision makers if they make the decision based on the emotion rather than based on logic solely.
However, one might suggest that the decisions that are made out of emotions are rather narrow in the perspective. It is possibly true that the emotional decisions can constricts ones potential to see all sides of the angles. For instance, if the President of the United States waited to see the various angles while making the decision to assasinate the Bin Laden. He may not have taken this beneficial decision to kill the Laden to preclude the calamities that he and his people did to world. Thus, this proves that decision that are made out with the emotions are often the betterment of the society.
In Nutshell, the decisions based on the emotions shows the better result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans general 49
- The following appeared as part of an article in a Dillton newspaper In an effort to bring new jobs to Dillton and stimulate the city s flagging economy Dillton s city council voted last year to lower the city s corporate tax rate by 15 percent at the same 69
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...eir mistakes. In such case, parents are more better decision makers if they make the decisi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the emotional decisions can constricts ones potential to see all sides of the angle...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07073954984 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57492234454 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466237942122 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1636540433 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391768114785 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166066027642 0.0831039109588 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103681469235 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271443469446 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172420827342 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.