People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It may be impossible to avoid slight emotional bias in the day to day things we do. Emotion seeps into everything we as humans do, and that is what discriminates us from machines. Important decisions should be dispassionate. Decision making is no exception. Most of our decisions are heavily biased by emotions. We should make decisions based on logical assumptions and not allow emotional bias to influence our decisions.
Emotional bias should be secondary while making decisions. Since we have to live with the consequences of our decisions, we should thoroughly consider logical reasons before making important decisions. For example, some people allow their emotions to control them while considering there life partners, not considering the lifelong consequences. The harsh reality of such decisions is observed in the fact that fifty percent marriages result in divorce.
While it is difficult to avoid emotional bias while taking decisions, the reality is only logical correct assumption would lead to a correct decision. The consequences of the decisions won't consider your emotions, like we do while making decisions. We should always evaluate the pro's and con's and the impact the decision will have on our lives. For example, many people make slapdash decisions while choosing to adopt pets like dogs and cats. They are heavily influenced by their emotions that how lovely and cute the dog or cat is. Only few think logically about the responsibility that comes with adopting a pet. You have to make countless trips to the vet, always monitor them, not to mention the financial burden. An emotionally biased decision would result in the pet being abandoned.
While emotions do qualify our ability to take good decisions, sometimes it may be appropriate to consider our emotions as well. Letting emotions into our decision making may make living with those decisions easier. Sometimes what is logical, may also seem inhumane and heartless to humans. Sometimes we forgive our loved ones for their mistakes which may not be logically correct.
Ultimately, we should always consider the impacts of the decision, examine the logical assumptions and consider pro's and con's while taking decisions. Only is some exceptional cases should we chose emotion over logic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, so, well, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30110497238 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76876208193 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502762430939 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5460146717 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.9583333333 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244578195856 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869274344295 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065520761338 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147313813273 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580905986288 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.