People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ikely to drive the major decisions in a persons life in to an arrant disaster. The rami...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...m. Decisions play a prominent role in a persons life right from choosing a school to se...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...quires a better insights about future. Further to add, when the situation is so poigna...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...by such persons are merely irreversible so as to always end up in a pathetic situation. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'clearer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: clearer
...s around a person is addressed in a way more clearer with total lucid perceptions, a person ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 427, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding happenings'?
Suggestion: the surrounding happenings
...on is sure to have a clear vision about the happenings around him, if he/she practices yoga and meditatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cuses given after facing the aftermath.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3111.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 634.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90694006309 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01790360848 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79248641464 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493690851735 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1024.2 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9098358467 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.275862069 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8620689655 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89655172414 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317823088589 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973178489387 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980247061997 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201855046801 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100532940543 0.0667264976115 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 100.480337079 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.