People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Decision making is always an innate ability which has been given to human beings. People who socialise and incorporate themselves in the a society with higher standards go through a lot of stress and emotional situations by which they are forced to take certain decisions unwillingly. There are two types of people who make up their decision, futuristic thinker and person who thinks on the go. A Futuristic thinker usually involves themselves in thoughts and foresee the consequences of the decision. But when they are pushed to a position where they have to choose on their emotion and circumstances, there is no point in blaming them.
Certain people who think more about the ramifications of the actions, should also be responsible for the decisions they take. But the decision they took is because of emotions or a gut feeling, which might always worked out and if it didn't worked out at certain situation, people should try to take it practically. For example Mahendra Singh Dhoni who is the Captain of Indian cricket takes a lot of circumstances call during an important match. Around 80% of the time it worked well for the country, while it didn't worked certain times. For that we cannot blame the person and epithet him as poor decision maker. His emotion calls have also involved insightful thinking which led to the world cup victory two times during 2007 and 2011. So the emotional decisions of certain people who is futuristic and insightful about the aftereffects should not be blamed for the calls they take.
On the other hand, people who never think about the consequences and always work with emotions are the ones who can be treated as poor decision makers. Because they are the people who never thought about the repercussions which it might lead. Good example is Napoleon the king when he invaded for a war with his whole troop, he just came with an emotional call. But finally it led to a major disaster by losing his whole troop because of the climatic conditions in the war field. This is an historic event, for which even people in modern ages used to blame him for the abrupt decision. People who always take decision on the go or certain individuals whose decision is taken by emotion or for their pride, then those people should be held responsible for the decision.
So it is always depends up on the mentally of the people and how well they think and lead their situation plays a very big role in decision making. I would like to conclude that futuristic and keen person who thinks about the consequences should not be blamed if its ending up to be a bad decision. But a person who is not involved in to the situation and taking just by an emotional feel should be reprehensible for the decision and therefore they are blameworthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 62
- 23% Users answered correctlyClaim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalisation through new leadership. 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the Dean of Residential Life at Radsliffe College.“To continue to meet the needs of our students who require housing, we must update our housing system to not only meet safety standards but also to provide amenities 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States."For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses. Last year, however, all of the 81
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...socialise and incorporate themselves in the a society with higher standards go throug...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es of people who make up their decision, futuristic thinker and person who thinks...
^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...which might always worked out and if it didnt worked out at certain situation, people...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t worked well for the country, while it didnt worked certain times. For that we canno...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can be treated as poor decision makers. Because they are the people who never thought a...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211650485437 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.163106796117 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0776699029126 0.0880659088768 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0466019417476 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0640776699029 0.0444667217837 144% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.122330097087 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0368932038835 0.0406280797675 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59039913852 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021359223301 0.030933414821 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00970873786408 0.0016655270985 583% => OK
Determiners: 0.100970873786 0.0997080785238 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021359223301 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0446601941748 0.0148568991511 301% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2771.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 482.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7489626556 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338174273859 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.217842323651 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.147302904564 0.200843997647 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0933609958506 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59039913852 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44398340249 0.48968727796 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.0309491507 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9523809524 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2172597044 59.4972553346 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.952380952 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9523809524 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 44.7366133175 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.35460992908 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423901652871 0.391690518653 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122555961778 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0791866131237 0.077325440228 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524558509263 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115381594527 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178944259575 0.161403998019 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646419607847 0.0892212321368 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.466232804108 0.385218514788 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0722801112049 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321769654185 0.275328986314 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489668810984 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.