People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
In context to the given statement, I would completely agree with the idea that discussions cannot be made on basis of emotions. Emotions are part of a human system so that we can feel our environment, and not to make decisions with it. If we were to make decisions on basis of emotions, we would rather be counted among animals. The only thing that separates us from animals is our intellect, our ability to respond on basis of our logic.
Decisions made using emotions are impulsive. It comes as a response to the stimulus. We might get angry at a certain situation, but anger doesn't bears us forever. For instance, we find that a colleague we are working with doesn't completes a task assigned to him by you. On basis of your impulse, first thing you would want to be is scold him and insult him in your fury against the incomplete task. On contrary, there is a possibility that he was stuck with something that was of utmost priority to him at that given instance, let's say, he was unwell due to which we couldn't focus on the task and complete it. The other side, really helps us understanding our reaction, which wouldn't be a case when we respond using our impulse.
Emotions are something that hinders are logical processing. We react to people positively when we are happy, we react negatively when we are said. This doesn't counts the possibilities we should consider before making a decision. For instance, when someone is persuasive we usually tend to incline to what he/she has to say, because we tell our emotion direct our decision.
Once a decision is made emotionally and then tried to be covered with our logic, will actually backfire at us. Consider, that a person 'A' dispelled a person 'B' from the job for some reason, 'C' peeps through the whole situation and is crestfallen for the loss of 'B', impulsively 'C' gives a refuge to 'B'. Over a period of time, 'C'realizes that 'B' is clumsy, neglectful, and lacks a certain skills required to do the job. Now that the damage is done, 'C' has to rather bear the presence of 'B' or he can replace 'B' be with someone else, in either case he will be doing the same thing 'A' did to him. Therefore, it is better to analyze before drawing a conclusion.
Emotions could also serve a helpful purpose in times of need. When we need to get the work done which we are unable to do with our humbleness, we need to use anger to get an alternate response. Whatever, the case is, emotions will eventually turn against us, whereas an analytical response will eliminate a backfire and also serve an unprejudiced response. For it was the reasoning of Tyrion Lannister in Game of Thrones, that help him survive and help others, and not his emotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity to respond on basis of our logic. Decisions made using emotions are impuls...
^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...angry at a certain situation, but anger doesnt bears us forever. For instance, we find...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nd that a colleague we are working with doesnt completes a task assigned to him by you...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...lets say, he was unwell due to which we couldnt focus on the task and complete it. The ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to understand' or 'understand'.
Suggestion: to understand; understand
...ete it. The other side, really helps us understanding our reaction, which wouldnt be a case w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ps us understanding our reaction, which wouldnt be a case when we respond using our imp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...react negatively when we are said. This doesnt counts the possibilities we should cons...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...pulsively C gives a refuge to B. Over a period of time, Crealizes that B is clumsy, neglectful...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...clumsy, neglectful, and lacks a certain skills required to do the job. Now that the da...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201851851852 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.194444444444 0.157235817809 124% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0518518518519 0.0880659088768 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0481481481481 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.1 0.0444667217837 225% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.109259259259 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0351851851852 0.0406280797675 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63356739193 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0425925925926 0.030933414821 138% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0796296296296 0.0997080785238 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0240740740741 0.0249443105267 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0240740740741 0.0148568991511 162% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2684.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 484.0 452.878318584 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.293388429752 0.366273622748 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227272727273 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159090909091 0.200843997647 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113636363636 0.132149295362 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63356739193 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 219.290929204 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506198347107 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 59.1721806742 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1666666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7358651096 59.4972553346 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 42.8939393939 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.01081081081 1.64882698954 61% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122785789125 0.391690518653 31% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0927639351098 0.123202303941 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0661548814309 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.469702800191 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147921526077 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505396980155 0.161403998019 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484828160077 0.0892212321368 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319228034121 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.090832863113 0.0692045440612 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850646380353 0.275328986314 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356535824202 0.0653680567796 55% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.