People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The statement contends that the people who have the habit to take the decisions based on the emotions and then justify those with the logic after everything is done, they are the poor decision makers. There is always a reason behind taking a particular decision according to the situation and circumstances. There is a time when many crucial and important decisions are to be taken in an instant, so at that time according to the situation and the consequences an individual should think logically as well as emotionally as per the need of the situation. I do not agree with the statement, as every decision taken emotionally cannot be marked as specious.
Firstly, every decision making is a part of the situation. We would not know what type of the decision we have to make at an instant of time. Some circumstances are there where we need to show humanity and so take the decision emotionally considering the relations and the situation of that time as crucial and painstaking. Every human being around is enrolled in the race of life. At some or the other time, they are kept in a situation by destiny that they need to think many times before taking the final decision. For example, an individual who is of work and family, and needs to take a very crucial decision taking into consideration both the family and the work, that person has to think for both of the situations. Emotionally for family and logically for the work.
Secondly, If the individual is not thinking about the family and making the decisions with the mind, he would face a problem in managing his family. Some of the decisions in which the relations and the family, friends and the close one's are a matter of concern, the decisions are taken emotionally and they are never the wrong decision makers. Every situation has caused and it is necessary to know the reason behind the cause. Who are the individuals who would be affected the most while taking that decision should be forknowledged.
Thirdly, for example, there is a building and construction site, where day and night the workers are working under the guidance of the constructors, builders, and the site planners. Those laborers are the one who are the most important people who get their work done on the fingertips of their head. Their work is very painstaking and exhausting. In the response, the builders need to take care of them. If they had the order to complete the work within the next few days and, their workload is abundant, the head would first think about the laborers. He would think that they would get tired if they are overloaded with work, after all, they are also human beings. So, such decisions are to be taken emotionally and not for granted.
If some of the decisions are not taken emotionally, then it can be a case where strong relationships are at the verge of the extinction. Some of the very important people and the situations are ruined by our such logical decision. At that time, the one one who has taken that logical decision would be a wrong decision maker.
Summing it up, we can say that the decisions are to be taking considering the severity of the situation and the circumstances. No logical decision would turn fruitful in the case of the relations, and no vice versa. So ,the one who is making the decision emotionally and then justifying that decision can never always be a wrong decision maker. It's always a matter of priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- “Nation’s should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers oftheir citizens are hungry or unemployed.” 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 54
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... face a problem in managing his family. Some of the decisions in which the relations and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ry to know the reason behind the cause. Who are the individuals who would be affect...
^^^
Line 9, column 5, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...emotionally and not for granted. If some of the decisions are not taken emotionally, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ips are at the verge of the extinction. Some of the very important people and the situation...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: one
...uch logical decision. At that time, the one one who has taken that logical decision wou...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of the relations, and no vice versa. So ,the one who is making the decision emoti...
^^
Line 11, column 347, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...never always be a wrong decision maker. Its always a matter of priority.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'while', 'after all', 'as to', 'for example', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210687022901 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.167938931298 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0473282442748 0.0880659088768 54% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0641221374046 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0396946564885 0.0444667217837 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106870229008 0.12292977631 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0580152671756 0.0406280797675 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68169862394 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0213740458015 0.030933414821 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0030534351145 0.0016655270985 183% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.160305343511 0.0997080785238 161% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0213740458015 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0213740458015 0.0148568991511 144% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3422.0 2732.02544248 125% => OK
No of words: 597.0 452.878318584 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73199329983 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.281407035176 0.366273622748 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.217755443886 0.280924506359 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184254606365 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122278056951 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68169862394 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.375209380235 0.48968727796 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.7988687962 55.4138127331 81% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6194690265 141% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5862068966 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4617335671 59.4972553346 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5862068966 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.551724137931 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 42.3617512852 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.38202247191 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18281830919 0.391690518653 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148821498336 0.123202303941 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0972569091577 0.077325440228 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.555368256386 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165162177947 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778936357841 0.161403998019 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574510828731 0.0892212321368 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.590309577438 0.385218514788 153% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0658196136483 0.0692045440612 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138749009852 0.275328986314 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326898967698 0.0653680567796 50% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88274336283 246% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 3.66592920354 273% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.70907079646 369% => OK
Total topic words: 26.0 13.5995575221 191% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.