The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by the leader than any of his or her inherent skills and abilities
People assess political leaders’ greatness based on different views, some claim their greatness has more to do with the challenges they faced during their service. Meanwhile, others relate their greatness to the inherent abilities and skills they possess. Inherent abilities and skills may be abstract in some cases; Consequently, an assessment of a politician should be predicated majorly on more realistic grounds such as the challenges he encountered while serving.
In the same manner educational institutions assess a student’s skills by examinations, a leader’s abilities are appraised by his performance while tackling the problems he faces. Natural abilities are not as conspicuous to the masses the way the challenges a leader encounters are. Therefore, the citizens are more liable to perceive his greatness by what they can measure as opposed to abstract talents.
Besides the challenges being more obvious to the people, they affect them directly. For example, a president is more taken as being great for solving the power problems in a country than a president that only possess the ability to improve the work ethic of workers in the power sector. For this reason, a ruler will be adjudged to be more successful for his tribulations.
Although, skills set provides the leader with adequate tools to tackle his challenges, they don’t portray the extent of his performance as much as his tribulations would. Skills could be seen as being theoretical principles while challenges could be perceived as practicals. Demonstrations are more relatable to the people compared to theoretical principles which would be abstract to most.
Thus, the greatness associated to an individual be it, political leader or otherwise, is to a large degree according to the tribulations he overcomes rather that the intrinsic skills he boasts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | Venissa | 50 | view |
| 2018-09-18 | Damilola2011 | 50 | view |
- Some students like classes where teachers lecture (do all of the talking) in class. Other students prefer classes where the students do some of the talking. Which type of class do you prefer? Give specific reasons and details to support your choice 71
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by the leader than any of his or her inherent skills and abilities 50
- In your country, is there more need for land to be left in its natural condition or is there more need for land to be developed for housing and industry? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- How to curb corruption if you were the president of your country 73
- The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... examinations, a leader's abilities are appraised by his performance while t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49305555556 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1272831166 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9477866843 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.692307692 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339638417324 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123688055475 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608149860734 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189159117067 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714111449197 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.