Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy even though they cause damage to the environment

The stated argument is baseless argument which lacks proper proofs and the statistical data. The reasoning done by author is not properly explaining the stated argument. The conclusions are drawn on the insufficient data and hence it is not cogent.

The author states that the Northeast areas of USA, it just states the area but not the specific number of bakeries in that area. The amount of the cellulose, glucose that the saccharin contains is not given and hence on what factors the comparison done between the sugar and the saccharin is not given. Sugar or Saccharin, which of them is cost-effective is also not stated in the given argument.

The 10% customers had grumbled about change, 10% of what amount is not stated in the given argument. Were the opinions of the people all types of age groups were taken into consideration? The people might be suffering from the severe diabetes who grumbled about the change. These people might have another health issues as well. The taste gets affected due to the saccharin is also not mentioned in the stated argument.

Besides when was this information gathered is also not given the argument. The valid or the main reason to substitute the sugar is also missing. The information given might be too old, and now the scenarios might have changed, that is the use of saccharin might have been proved to be detrimental. The weather conditions might play a huge role so, the fact that saccharin is used in Northeast areas of USA might be beneficial there. It is not necessary that it is beneficial for the other areas where there are Bagel Mania bakeries are there.

The stated argument lacks all proper reasoning of all the above stated points, it undermines the statement, that other branches of Bagel Mania bakeries must also use Saccharin as a substitute of sugar.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...roperly explaining the stated argument. The conclusions are drawn on the insufficie...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ent data and hence it is not cogent. The author states that the Northeast areas ...
^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ecific number of bakeries in that area. The amount of the cellulose, glucose that t...
^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ght have been proved to be detrimental. The weather conditions might play a huge ro...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87459807074 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57696530808 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459807073955 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.48776375 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1764705882 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29411764706 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0173411078135 0.243740707755 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00568573284479 0.0831039109588 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0125816001304 0.0758088955206 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00866929979153 0.150359130593 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121720868245 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.