Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
It is said that common ground and reasonable consensus should be more pursued by politicians rather than ideas that are difficult to reach. I agree with the argument to some extent.
Elusive ideals are those which are difficult to find. I can understand why some people believe that politicians should not focus on them. Most of the time obtaining such ideals can cost people’s lives. For example, we can see some politicians such as Hitler who endangered his people’s lives just because of his elusive ideals. Or the president of Iran Ahmadi Nejad who with his elusive ideals and aggressive attitudes towards the atomic right of Iran, portrayed Iran as a hostile zone. He changed the good view of countries towards Iran. Having elusive ideals can be good when they are in favor of people. For example, some leaders such as Gandhi had elusive ideals. His ideal was the freedom of India from the colony of England. He did not choose violence or the method that could hurt his people. He tried to gain his goal with altruistic methods. I believe that politicians should pursue their elusive ideals when they think they have this ability to develop and improve their society with such ideals. Each society for the achievement of success needs to have some leaders with elusive ideals.
However, I also believe that pursuing common ground and reasonable consensus should be the first priority of politicians. Each politician for gaining the trust of people should provide the needs and welfare of them. He should listen to his people’s requests and follows the reasonable ones. The elusive ideals should be considered alongside the common ground and reasonable consensus. when they are considered with each other, after a while they complement each other and then most of the time the elusive ideals become the people’s ideals. This also motivates people to try for them. For instance, we can consider the current conditions of Iran. The elusive ideal of Rouhani is having good relationships with superpower countries while the rights of Iran are respected. He always tries to use altruistic ways to reach this goal. Now his goal is also people’s goal, and with their union, they bear any difficulty in this way. This is because Rouhani tries to consider both sides, namely his people and his ideals.
To summarize, in my view politicians should equally pursue elusive ideals and common ground. In this way, they can keep balance in their country.
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 33
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves as socially and culturally. 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...common ground and reasonable consensus. when they are considered with each other, af...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55281394005 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5828294983 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.2857142857 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6428571429 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17857142857 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330675388931 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993141701641 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141410630762 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279293593833 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106947814533 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.