A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned.
It is said that university education is something more than the specialized study of a single discipline, and for more knowledge, the broad spectrum of liberal arts, including history and literature should be added to university courses.
On the one hand, I believe that universities by restriction of courses to specialized ones try to limit the progress of students in other fields. Academic courses are essential but other fields such as art, history, and literature are also important and they should be taught alongside science and other specialized courses. Restricted curriculum means that students have fewer areas to explore. Each course has its own merits and it should be respected. For example, with history, students can know about their ancestors and the history of their country. They learn from the experiences of their ancestors and try to build a better society. With literature, students can learn about the poets and their poetries and their literary works. They learn more about their mother tongue, the grammar of their language. In other words, these courses enlighten the minds of students.
It is true when students come to university need to become more specialized in the field of study they have chosen. But their horizon and view about the world should be broadened, and with the liberal art courses, that can be done. In my view, liberal arts should be taught alongside specialized courses, and students should not be limited to only some academic courses related to their field of study.
In conclusion, I believe that with liberal arts such as literature and history students can broaden their view and horizon and these courses should be taught alongside specialized courses.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus, the number of 50
- Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of national security? 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my view, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20216606498 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63755906076 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469314079422 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7525993169 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261314174337 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974748330717 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867130834512 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202375632909 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809341868359 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.