Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
There are always different ideas about the preferences that a politician should hold in governing a society. Many believe that they should operate in a way and pursue the goals that are in complete agreement by others rather than following their ideals. This method can be consider as a proper one in governing and I agree with it to some extents.
First, it should be said that all politicians serves individuals of a society and are elected by them in order to be a representative of them: To provide their requirements, respect their values and follow their goals.Thus, It will be reasonable that authorities of a nation prioritise subjects and promote their plans in grounds that satisfy the expectations of majority of following people.Also, more controversial fields lead to more tensions and disorder in society that can impair the integrity of that society. An example, is about Iran nuclear argument, which after years governors reach to the thought that they should take a compromise position in order to have more peaceful and developed country so act based on their people and international society wanting. Of course, as it is said in the above topic this grounds should be reasonable, otherwise can lead a nation to disastrous conditions.
Further, Pursuing common grounds can create a conducive situation in order to improve and develop a nation. When people and groups are satisfied with the grounds that authorities are working ,they will contribute and cooperate in order to promote such aspects and accelerate the process of reaching goals and expected results, so it is useful that governors pursue common grounds.
On the other hand, it is essential that politicians do not forget their ideals and abandon more complicated goals that may cause some groups objections. Some of this grounds will be proved to be beneficial and vital, as time goes by. But the point is that, operating in more according fields can even made such elusive ideals more popular and ease politicians way in persuading opponents.
So, I believe that considering more common grounds in governing a society by their leaders can be a effective method to develop and improve that society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | michox | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | PURANNGU | 54 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | wwwww | 75 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Pavan kumar 08 | 66 | view |
| 2018-08-31 | quantumdweller | 62 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 57
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tradition of all- 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores."In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famou 70
This method can be consider as
This method can be considered as
all politicians serves individuals of a society and are elected by them in order to be a representative of them
Description: 'them' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
When people and groups are satisfied with the grounds that authorities are working ,they will contribute
Description: 'they' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
can be a effective method
can be an effective method
Sentence: Of course, as it is said in the above topic this grounds should be reasonable, otherwise can lead a nation to disastrous conditions.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and grounds
Sentence: On the other hand, it is essential that politicians do not forget their ideals and abandon more complicated goals that may cause some groups objections.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to groups and objections
Sentence: Some of this grounds will be proved to be beneficial and vital, as time goes by.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and grounds
Sentence: But the point is that, operating in more according fields can even made such elusive ideals more popular and ease politicians way in persuading opponents.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to politicians and way
Sentence: First, it should be said that all politicians serves individuals of a society and are elected by them in order to be a representative of them: To provide their requirements, respect their values and follow their goals.Thus, It will be reasonable that authorities of a nation prioritise subjects and promote their plans in grounds that satisfy the expectations of majority of following people.Also, more controversial fields lead to more tensions and disorder in society that can impair the
Error: prioritise Suggestion: priorities
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1787 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.95 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.718 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.966 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.352 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.626 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5