Present your perspective on the issue below, "People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does."
From a very ancient time, people realised the importance of cooperation and started working in unity. This in turn fostered understanding and trust among the team members which is good for individual development. Even today, teamwork is highly regarded as a virtue. People are often asked in interviews if they are good team players, can they work with other people etc. Though, one cannot undermine the results that engendered out of individual work and persistence like the telephone, microscope, modern theory of relativity. This kind of a dilemma begs the question what kind of an environment is more conducive for optimum productivity. Though there is no certain answer but it has been observed that, depending on what the situation is; sometimes teamwork is needed and sometimes individuality.
Modern work is full of marvels that are a result of teamwork. From the early aeroplane by the Wright brothers to the search engine Google by Sergei Brin and Larry Page. This goes to show that how working in team is efficient and smart. People individually have their own strengths and weaknesses but when amalgamated to form and work as a cohesive unit, they can complement each other. Weaknesses can be conquered, more accuracy can be achieved and quality can be enhanced - these are some of the benefits of working as a group. In case of decision making scenarios, where one individual can get stuck at a juncture, members of a team can work together to find out a suitable and efficient outcome. Working in a team also builds character as it helps in building trust, taking on responsibilities, adjusting to external circumstances and thinking about the team before oneself. Recent times has shown that a team of "good" can even take down the best when in the Copa America finals Chile defeated Argentina. The Chile team of not so renowned players stopped the best player in the World, Messi from scoring and won the cup. Thus, teamwork is definitely productive both professionally and personally.
Still, it will be unjust if we don't throw the light on some the most amazing individual feats to understand that through sincerity, and dedication and perseverance; a man can overcome hurdles and achieve victory. Facebook, the ubiquitous social networking site is probably the best example of a 'one-man work'. Many might say that other people were involved too but in the very early stages, only Mark Zuckerberg was the one who built it. Sometimes, if a person may get restrained in a group because of having more than average intellect and may feel hindered by other teammates. History is witness to many legends who, alone went on to change the world, although they faced criticism and ridicule at their time. Einstein, Newton to name a few. This proves that individual genius is as well productive as working in unison yet no conclusion can be drawn as to which one is superior.
In conclusion, both teamwork and individual work is productive depending on the scenario and environment. Given a situation, one needs to know which method to employ and how to achieve the best out of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-14 | himanshugarg | 66 | view |
| 2016-07-17 | gogol90 | 16 | view |
- Present your perspective on the issue below, "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. 58
- Present your perspective on the issue below, "People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does." 16
Comments
ok
ok
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...cope, modern theory of relativity. This kind of a dilemma begs the question what kind of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 575, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ind of a dilemma begs the question what kind of an environment is more conducive for optim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...and quality can be enhanced - these are some of the benefits of working as a group. In case...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive both professionally and personally. Still, it will be unjust if we dont thro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lly. Still, it will be unjust if we dont throw the light on some the most amazin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...bly the best example of a one-man work. Many might say that other people were involved too...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228222996516 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.16724738676 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.088850174216 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0522648083624 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0209059233449 0.0444667217837 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121951219512 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0505226480836 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82669478408 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0226480836237 0.030933414821 73% => OK
Particles: 0.00348432055749 0.0016655270985 209% => OK
Determiners: 0.0993031358885 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0261324041812 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0243902439024 0.0148568991511 164% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3096.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 520.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95384615385 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351923076923 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263461538462 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198076923077 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132692307692 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82669478408 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 219.290929204 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 68.4991371744 55.4138127331 124% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7054363224 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.84 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.44 0.674092028746 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 47.1461538462 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.66666666667 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18250536283 0.391690518653 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0769598811228 0.123202303941 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0578366347189 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.411525117862 0.547984918172 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118650201216 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669041042436 0.161403998019 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332240234308 0.0892212321368 37% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.472574235844 0.385218514788 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0338072436023 0.0692045440612 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139711920699 0.275328986314 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023540528579 0.0653680567796 36% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.4325221239 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.