The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There is no time in the history that technologies are changed and improved more rapidly and dramatically than past several decades. As, nowadays, these technologies generally makes human life more productive and efficient, some people believe that this should be the primary goal when people develop and improve technologies. As far as I am concerned, I totally agree with this point of view.
People who disagree with this statement may argue that, instead of aiming at saving time for people, the development of technologies should aim at enhancing the well-beings of human societies. Admittedly, technologies benefits humans in many aspects and make our life more convenient and enjoyable. With the advent of cars, ferries and flights, people are able to travel around and explore the world. Thanks to the invention of computer and the Internet, people can search for a variety of information any time from anywhere. It cannot be denied that these innovations contribute a lot to our well-being. Close scrutiny on the effect of these technologies, however, reveals that they actually all save people's time.
Primarily, with the help of technologies, people no longer need to deal with trivial daily problems and thus have more time for meaningful matters. Different from people in the generation of horse and buggy, people now do not need to walk for hours to school or to work anymore. In this case, a person can even work in one city and commute back to his or her home at another city to have dinner together with other family members. Therefore, we can see technologies favors people by saving them time.
In addition, with the aid of technologies, modern people can do a lot of things that ancient people were not able to do within the span of their lives. Take, for example, the learning approaches of modern people which are very different from people in previous generations. Back in ancient times, a person who want to know a certain knowledge may need to go to libraries and read a lot of books in order to find the piece of information he or she wants, As a consequence, it takes a long time for people to master a skill and cause them to have no time on developing second or third interest. Yet, by using the Internet, people now can access to abundant of information and useful online tutorials which help them to gain skills quickly.
In conclusion, the primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency. By saving people's time and let them be able to do more things, technologies are creating a great amount of value for human societies and dramatically enhancing the well-being of human..
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | mflzzz | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | mflzzz | 54 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: Scrutiny
...ons contribute a lot to our well-being. Close scrutiny on the effect of these technologies, ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ically enhancing the well-being of human..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93512304251 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80478569873 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0475164456 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.105263158 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282749678661 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946963064351 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603545054676 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17421624424 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375770318364 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.