The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.

Essay topics:

The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.

Technological innovations are a key for developing a better functioning society, companies, nations and institutions are all focusing on developing products, techniques and tools to make human life better. It is thus, no shock when billions of dollars are spent on a product which expedites a process – innovation of light bulbs from gas lamps was not cheap. The process of innovation is daunting as at certain cases many of these technological innovations fail miserably – Windows operating system for mobile – although the aim is to provide better functioning, the market reaction plays a major role in deciding its true fate. I prompt directs that the technological advancements should alleviate lives. I strongly agree with it because of two reasons.

Technological advancements shape a better world and this makes faster delivery of products. Indeed, it is true that the primary aim for most innovations, patents and research is to depict tangible result which shape lives – affecting billions. In the process, it has been evident that they somehow improve lives. For instance, introduction of computers made it easy to write documents, edit it and print it which were not a very easy process before – initially we used typewriter on which there were keys which allowed us to write on it, the problem was it was very mechanical, after every line we must realign from the fresh line, moreover, if there were changes to be made we had to make use of whitener. The introduction of modern technology such as computers, have expedited the above process, now just by hitting the back space or using shortcut key buttons we can either add or delete complex chunks of data. Thu, it can be directed from the above instance that the technological advancement has made world a better place, influenced billions of people and is helping us deliver the product with efficacy. The above in turn results in “getting the job done” on time which provides us with leisure time and to do things which enhance our prior arts.

Faster growth and widespread innovation on a technology will take place only if it has a potential to change lives. Academia and industry collaborate on research proposals, exchange dialects and embrace the future innovation only if the work has real-time application. For instance, current research on VANET (Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks) has recently been adopted – although it was introduced in 2001 – because of need for better traffic management, gathering traffic conditions and its need for saving lives. The major consortium are working on this – IEEE has introduced a dedicated protocol called IEEE 802.11 p – to make sure that or future generations do have access to better functioning society. The major cause of it was because of having a controlled and sophisticated traffic. Thus, the institutions and industries usually innovate on products and technology which has a potential to improves lives. If the innovation has a minuscule application in the future, the probability is that it will not be widely cherished – many patents are left as is, they never come to life as products. It can be evident that introduction of better traffic condition will improve our lives and provide us with better quality of livelihood; also provide us leisure time which we can spend with our family. The above example illustrates that the current focus usually lies on the area where there is a possibility of a real-time application of a thing which can change the world and improve our lives; which in turn provides us a better quality time.

Although, the technological innovations are usually productive and incremental, opponents of the view can argue that many innovations are destructive – TNT (trinitrotoluene), atomic bombs, etc. It can still be noted that these innovations have been useful in a certain way for instance TNT has a heavy applications in mining – for underground explosions and for rupturing buildings. It can be evident that the above results in a real-time tangible application of the innovation which indeed provides leisure time while comparing to previous mining methods. Moreover, introduction of atomic bombs has in a way shaped our society by imposing constraints on it and the further innovation resulted in extraction of energy from nuclear sources – it is regarded as the only source of energy which has a great future perspective. Thus, the application of an innovation depends on the users and their minds, but the only thing which is certain is that the innovation which will ease life will exist and others will perish.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 jason123 66 view
2019-12-15 siyuan 79 view
2019-12-15 siyuan 79 view
2019-11-30 Yann 50 view
2019-11-24 mmtsaha92 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user swapnil.paliwal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 301, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'application'?
Suggestion: application
...ertain way for instance TNT has a heavy applications in mining – for underground explosions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for instance, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3862.0 2235.4752809 173% => OK
No of words: 756.0 442.535393258 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10846560847 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.24361079503 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91912097244 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 337.0 215.323595506 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445767195767 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1225.8 704.065955056 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6765379787 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.538461538 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0769230769 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134969610951 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465662340792 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409810390299 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879961895911 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254868719528 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 184.0 100.480337079 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.7820224719 178% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.