Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Government is a consortium of elected leaders by its populace. The government is for the people, by the people and from the people. We entrust the government to make decisions and pass laws which promote the society to its better form, than it currently is. The prompt provides a dilemma of a sort, as it suggests that some people find it necessary for political leaders of the government to withhold the information from its people, and some do not. I believe that the government should hold the information from its populace because of three reasons.
Atomic Energy innovations should not be made public. Every country is focusing on developing atomic energies and weapons for power and defense purposes. These innovations are motivated by use of constrained resources and improving defense systems, but if exposed to wrong hands can be detrimental to nations as these can easily be misused. It is because of above information, the government and political leaders hide these facts. Moreover, the patents filed on atomic energy or instruments are published in a specialized journal, which is not made available to the general public. This journal can however be accessed via few officials at higher level of hierarchy. This indeed is the correct approach, as it ensures these innovations are far from being misused. Thus, the political leaders and the government should hide this information.
It is important to hide information with respect to the defense oriented maneuvers.
The political leaders often make bold decisions to eliminate terrorist activities. Many secret service agents are involved in the missions – working for our wellbeing, are sometimes risking their lives by being physically involved in the terrorist groups as undercover agents. The political leaders of the government should under no circumstance reveal these critical and crucial information to the general populace, as it hinders with our security. For instance, the USA special service agent Robert James O'Neill who shot Osama was not revealed for long time. Similarly to ensure security of these agents and our country this information must be entrusted with political leaders and should not be made available to public.
Although one can argue that right to information act is introduced to keep people informed and prevent overpowering of the political leaders. However, perhaps the act should still have provision to hide sensitive information which if exposed will erode the security and wellbeing of the nation. Thus, as a whole the information should be hidden from the public if it is damaging to the nation as a whole. But, the information which is essential to the public according to the “right to information act” must be kept abreast to the public. Thus, as a whole it still remains a dilemma as of what information is worth exposing and what is not?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them. 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 66
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 73
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 66
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nal, which is not made available to the general public. This journal can however be accessed v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 562, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...t Osama was not revealed for long time. Similarly to ensure security of these agents and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 232, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ion to hide sensitive information which if exposed will erode the security and wel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, thus, well, for instance, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2181425486 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83460351235 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475161987041 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8573760591 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2916666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316358596708 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886113913379 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629778016087 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151631145821 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630201501763 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.