The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
What does real talent of a musicion mean? It is based on the way he/she created the symphonies or is it based the feeeling music causes to the listener? While some asses the talent of musician only posthumously, I believe that the death of musician has no relation to the assessment of his/her talents.
For example, Beethoven had hearing deficiencies. Despite of that he was able to produce such beautiful symphonies. Some of his symphonies are, after all this time, still considered among the best. This kind of talent is exception. Such abilities are of cource laudable even when he is alive. It is the music on which the musician should be judged, not his/her fame.
Though popularity has a way of prejudicing the true assessment of music, there is also a good reason behind the fame. If the music is awe-inspiring or really soothing then only it gets popularity. Gaining good level of popularity itself shows that something is really good about that music. If the contemperory population finds a particular music great then it is not reasonable to say that its musician does not have a talent.
Denying the musician of the praise that he/she is worthy of, can often be discouraging. There are cases of stopping producing music or even suicides of musicians because of not getting proper feedback. Good critical assessment of music is necessary for musician to sharpen his abilities, while waiting for several gererations to provide proper assessment does not seem healthy.
Considering the reasons and examples mentioned above,it is not proper to assess his/her work only after the musician has been dead for decades, though the honest assessment of talent of a musician is not impervious to his/her fame among the population.
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 82
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ething is really good about that music. If the contemperory population finds a par...
^^
Line 17, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...the reasons and examples mentioned above,it is not proper to assess his/her work on...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, still, then, while, after all, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07266435986 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78022890729 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2849622054 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2352941176 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352697531544 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10240285337 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10336025486 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208640717276 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869706177344 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.