Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Obviously, fighting for reforming in society or everywhere has gotten important dramatically these days. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question that influencing people by scandals would be the right way in order to have society without problems or not. In my opinion, sometimes, this method for facing problems can work very well, but we should consider, in some cases, it can also make our problems event bigger than before. Nevertheless, I prefer to disagree with this idea expressing, reforming with help of scandals is a good choice. The reasons to substantiate my ideas are explored in the following.
To begin with, pressuring by people and stress while trying to solve problem strongly influence managers and persons making mistakes. To put in the other hand, if we want to find solution and change our way, we need to let our officials focus on their faults and compensate them. It is crystal clear, using scandals drop in our power to deal with difficulties and disturb our concentrate. As a result, individuals making mistake wouldn’t try to solve problem and just want to finish issues with the help of lies or telling words that is not going to do any time. To easily perceive these words, regard soccer team losing in one match because of making mistake in defend, if we start to disturb defenders concentration and start to pressure on them, they can’t focus on their fault and try to compensate them.
Furthermore, scandals not only have bad effects on concentration but also can exaggerate by persons who have no news about that issue. Surely, a few people totally understand the problem and the side-effects of that. However everyone wants to tell the story from his mind and makes the issue bigger and bigger. To be specific, at first, we had faced common issues before people was aware and now, we are apologizing for issue that we have never done. We need to know, every time, someone deliberately try to use scandals for achieving their goals. Therefore, always, saying everything to people is not a good suggestion because magnifying problem can make our situation hard. Let suppose an actor arrests for tax issues and media proffer untruth comments about this event and want to tell their story. What happen to that actor after this issue? Does he can revert to his profession easily?
Without any shadow of doubt, using scandals has own positive effects in association with improving society. It is true that governments and countries, sometimes, are attempting to escape from their problems and not answering to their faults. Under such a circumstance, scandals compel them to response to their mistakes also force them to find solution for returning to former situation. Chernobyl disaster is a good instance to drive this fact home, the officials in that time, weren’t prefer to acknowledge about their faults in that event also weren’t aware the dangerous measure which threatened world in that time using scandals was a best way to prevent happening incident and protect world.
In conclusion, I almost believe that scandals have negative result for improving society, since disturb our concentration. In addition, persons can exaggerate the problem deliberately or because of lack of knowledge. Nonetheless, we have to mention, positive effect of scandal when the government wants to escape from their fault or not going to response to their mistakes.
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expertto make important contributions. 54
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 59
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. 54
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e problem and the side-effects of that. However everyone wants to tell the story from h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
... know, every time, someone deliberately try to use scandals for achieving their goa...
^^^
Line 3, column 847, Rule ID: DOES_XX_CAN[1]
Message: Possibly wrong usage of 'Does' in the question. Did you mean: 'can he'.
Suggestion: Can he
... happen to that actor after this issue? Does he can revert to his profession easily? Witho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 648, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...d world in that time using scandals was a best way to prevent happening incident ...
^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot going to response to their mistakes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2861.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 561.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09982174688 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76282559772 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522281639929 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 880.2 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7608394882 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.038461538 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5769230769 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20537486865 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561931160152 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435454115983 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120736136708 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288325922311 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.