Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals have the potential to impact majority of population adversely. Every scandal not only create economic growth and inflammatory topic to debate for news channel but it also question the robustness of any society, framework and policy. Many including the author consider them useful as they highlight our attentions to problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. I strongly disagree with this statement for three reasons.
Firstly, although scandals do gather lot of attention but their manifestation can have significant negative impact on majority. Hence, saying them useful is nonetheless to appreciating wrongdoing. E.g. corruption scandal by minister in India- Mr. Lallu yadav not only wasted thousand of crores of taxpayer's money but it also cost more than million cows to die because of poor quality food served to them. Such highly deteriorating manifestation can never be useful. Even if the outcome reveals about any loophole that can be exploited by some selfish people.
Secondly, author is wrong to say scandals focus problems in ways that no speaker/reformer ever could. As often scandals that happened in one country not happened in any other countries. It was reformer's teaching that saved one country from identical scandals that happened at other place. They provided one country with tools and knowledge to priorly tackle any scandals from occurring. E.g. the several scandals of corruption that happened in India never happened in countries like Germany and Canada. It was possible only because their reformers/speakers were aware of such upcoming problems and their government were having tools to avoid such negative manifestation. Hence, many times reformers in history reformers and speakers were able to focus on problems in way similar to scandals but their voice didn't reach worldwide. Such scenarios immensely diminish author's claim.
One may argue that scandals at times do brings immediate attention of the majority of population to loopholes in their society, beliefs or framework. Undoubtedly it is true, but even in such cases calling it useful is an exaggeration. Because what is useful is to develop a solution before it adversely impact the nation; which to my best knowledge, only speaker and reformers do! Scandals focus on loopholes when it's already too late to act upon and things are out of hands. At last that's what make them scandals!
Hence, it is incorrect to say that scandals are useful. Yes, they gather immediate attention, but that attention is gathered when damage has already taken place. It is reformers and speakers who prepare us to avoid occurrence of scandals. It is them who teach us all the precautions and it is precaution which is more useful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 86
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'questions'?
Suggestion: questions
... to debate for news channel but it also question the robustness of any society, framewor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... India- Mr. Lallu yadav not only wasted thousand of crores of taxpayers money but it als...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...payers money but it also cost more than million cows to die because of poor quality foo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ting manifestation can never be useful. Even if the outcome reveals about any loophole ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ys that no speaker/reformer ever could. As often scandals that happened in one cou...
^^
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...way similar to scandals but their voice didnt reach worldwide. Such scenarios immense...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...on and things are out of hands. At last thats what make them scandals! Hence, it i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., first, firstly, hence, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82195660707 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533180778032 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5113838698 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7916666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2083333333 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266304174772 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724511981623 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733157981056 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141123017529 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518030890756 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.