Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention on
problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals have been a part of almost every field. They involve shocking, immoral or illegal
behavior of people which is not approved of in the society. Because of their immoral nature they
raise different extreme feelings and reactions amongst people. A scandal is therefore a problem
generated in the society which becomes a concern and issue for a larger section of the society.
It is correct that we learn by making mistakes. It is only with experience of dealing with difficult
situations that a person becomes wiser and practical. The problem forces you to try all the
possible solutions and you come up with a permanent and lasting solution. Therefore, there is
increased number of chances of not repeating it again. This type of learning that comes by
actually committing mistakes lasts longer and you will never forget it. However, if you prepare
for a problem that you might face in future, you are not going to pay as much attention to it as
you pay to the existing problem.
When the problem takes shape of a scandal, there are more people involved and affected by it.
The feelings and sentiments of people are affected and finding a solution becomes all the more
difficult. It disrupts the peace, law and order of a place. It becomes very important to take control
and find a solution of such a situation. Hence it becomes the thing of utmost importance for any
leader to bring back the situation of peace and normalcy.
This task is also done by reformers and speakers. However, the difference lies in the fact that
reformers preach and spread morally and legally correct practices while in a scandal the leader
practically struggles to find a solution. It is human nature to give more importance to the existing
problems rather than prepare for a problem that you might face in future. Then comes the
question, "Is the solution found for an existing problem better than that for a problem that one
might face is future?" It may not be easy to answer this because the practicality of a solution is
seen only by practicing it. However, the work done by reformers cannot be ignored. It is but for
them that a society holds its morals and values.
We can then understand that scandals and existing problems are useful for us in a way since they
help in focusing our attention more towards the problem and its solution. However, who takes up
the responsibility of the situation? Considering that it involves a large number of people, a
solution cannot be found out unless all or the majority of people are willing to find a solution and
comply by the rules. A leader alone cannot find a permanent solution. Therefore, it depends upon
the attitude of the society as a whole to look at the scandal as a common problem and not remain
divided over it. This is where a reformer steps in. He unites people by preaching morally correctand good values. It is only by his teachings that a change can be brought in the thinking of
people and a lasting solution be found by the authorities.
Conclusively, it can be said that the scandals definitely focus our attention towards the problems
but a solution to the problem is found only when the attitude of people concerned is reformed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-04 | aerobics.arnie | 16 | view |
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in orderto thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved andgenerated. 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention onproblems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 35, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...pare for a problem that you might face in future, you are not going to pay as much atten...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 42, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nd find a solution of such a situation. Hence it becomes the thing of utmost importan...
^^^^^
Line 20, column 64, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...epare for a problem that you might face in future. Then comes the question, 'Is the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 27, column 67, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...situation? Considering that it involves a large number of people, a solution cannot be found out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.199672667758 0.240241500013 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.176759410802 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0589198036007 0.0880659088768 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0654664484452 0.0497285424764 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0654664484452 0.0444667217837 147% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.13093289689 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0523731587561 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64632481622 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0212765957447 0.030933414821 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00490998363339 0.0016655270985 295% => OK
Determiners: 0.121112929624 0.0997080785238 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0180032733224 0.0249443105267 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114566284779 0.0148568991511 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3221.0 2732.02544248 118% => OK
No of words: 558.0 452.878318584 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77240143369 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363799283154 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286738351254 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186379928315 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102150537634 0.132149295362 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64632481622 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437275985663 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.4508513846 55.4138127331 93% => OK
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6194690265 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6354759961 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.366666667 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 34.0 4.94800884956 687% => There are something wrong with the essay format.
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.2738351254 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.24468085106 1.64882698954 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104894569043 0.391690518653 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110001608975 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102629050439 0.077325440228 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.692003010631 0.547984918172 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.235567661792 0.149214159877 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412355235309 0.161403998019 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519763866614 0.0892212321368 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.127446906369 0.385218514788 33% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0917496331381 0.0692045440612 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417871438477 0.275328986314 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519170914433 0.0653680567796 79% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.30420353982 321% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 15.0 3.66592920354 409% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 26.0 13.5995575221 191% => OK
---------------------
It is not right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.